The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This section explains Policy NZ.5 on designing buildings to cope with a hotter climate. Major new developments must follow the cooling hierarchy, using passive measures first and active cooling such as air conditioning only as a last resort. Detailed overheating assessments using the industry methods CIBSE TM52 (non-residential) and TM59 (residential) are encouraged, ideally tested against projected 2050 or 2080 weather. The councils argue that the basic route through national Building Regulations Part O is not enough, partly because it does not cover workplaces, schools or leisure buildings.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
s regard.
Policy NZ.5
Climate Resilient Design
To protect occupants from the impacts of climate change, especially in a context of
increasing energy efficiency in buildings, applications for new-build major
development (10+ homes or 1000m2 floor space) should meet the following
expectations.
1. Demonstrate that overheating risk measures have been selected in
accordance with the cooling hierarchy, where the earlier steps should be
pursued before resorting to the later steps:
a. Minimise internal heat generation through energy-efficient design and
specification
b. Minimise the amount of heat entering the building in summer, using:
i. Building orientation
ii. Shading
iii. Albedo (reflective or light-coloured external materials)
iv. Fenestration and insulation.
c. Manage heat within the building through exposed-internal thermal
mass and high ceilings.
d. Passive ventilation.
e. Mechanical ventilation.
f. Active cooling measures as a last resort.
2. Detailed overheating assessment is encouraged, comprising the following
methodologies by CIBSE21:
a. CIBSE TM52 for non-residential development
b. CIBSE TM59 for residential development.
c. Within this, applicants are encouraged to use future weather files
(CIBSE Design Summer Year’ [DSY] for 2050 or 2080) as opposed to a
DSY based on previous decades’ weather. Where the building passes
the applicable overheating assessment using these future weather
files, this will be recognised as a significant benefit in climate
adaptation.
Policy Justification
6.1.22 Climate change is anticipated to increase average annual temperatures, the
occurrence and intensity of extreme weather events including
heatwaves, wildfires, flooding, drought and storms. Ensuring that new development and
changes to existing buildings respond to these changes is therefore a crucial element in
responding to the climate emergency and will create more resilient
communities, ecosystems and the economy for the future.
6.1.23 Climate resilient design is an approach to development that considers current
and future climate conditions to optimise building performance and energy efficiency,
as well as reducing the impact of development on the natural environment. The core
principles of climate resilient design include adapting to higher temperatures through
passive and natural cooling measures, reducing water consumption, managing
flood risk and mitigating biodiversity loss.
6.1.24 This policy sets out the climate resilient design requirements for new
development and changes to existing buildings.
6.1.25 While the Council is aware that there are national building regulations relating to
overheating risk mitigation (Part O), that regulation allows two possible routes to
compliance: A basic/simplified route, and an enhanced/dynamic route. The regulation
allows most developments to follow the basic/simplified route, which may not be
suitable to deal with future years’ increased overheating risk in the changing climate,
and also does not reflect the potential effects of the enhanced energy efficiency targets
set by this local plan’s separate policies NZ.1 and NZ.2. Additionally, Part O only covers
residential developments and therefore fails to protect people from overheating risks in
their place of work, study or leisure outside the home.
6.1.26 Because the space heat demand target set by policies NZ.1 and NZ.2 is tighter
than the standard that would be achieved by current Building Regulations, these
buildings will be more effective at holding on to heat that gets inside them, unless
careful design choices are made to avoid excess unwanted heat and to manage and
21 Chartered Institute of Building Service Engineers
remove this where it occurs. Without careful application of the cooling hierarchy (which
prioritises passive means first), developers might otherwise resort to seemingly simpler
technological solutions such as air conditioning which can have heavy energy use and
may undo some of the carbon savings that the local plan is aiming to achieve.
6.1.27 Therefore, the basic route to compliance with Building Regulations on
overheating is not considered sufficient. Instead, applicants are asked to utilise the
industry’s best practice overheating risk mitigation assessment method, CIBSE TM52 or
TM59 (for non-residential and residential respectively).
6.1.28 Applicants should note that CIBSE TM59 aligns with the enhanced/dynamic
route to compliance with national Building Regulations Part O.
6.1.29 The policy therefore does not contradict nor duplicate Part O, but specifies the
Council’s preferred route to compliance within Part O, and extends this to non-
residential buildings too so that South Warwickshire’s new build employment and
learning spaces will be equally ready for the increased frequency and intensity of
heatwaves that the UK is alr