The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This section sets out the full wording and reasoning behind Policy DS.1 on environmental mitigation and compensation. Compensation is only supported where avoidance and mitigation are not achievable and where measures are deliverable, secured and managed long term. Off-site measures should align with local priorities such as the Warwickshire Local Nature Recovery Strategy. The policy extends the national mitigation hierarchy beyond biodiversity to other natural assets and ecosystem services, and it does not override statutory tests on heritage, flood risk or biodiversity.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
al gains.
Policy DS.1
Environmental Mitigation and Compensation
Development proposals should apply a proportionate mitigation hierarchy to
potential environmental effects.
A. Mitigation Hierarchy
Development proposals will be expected to:
• avoid adverse environmental effects wherever possible;
• minimise and mitigate impacts where avoidance cannot reasonably be
achieved; and
• provide compensation measures only as a last resort where significant
residual effects remain following avoidance and mitigation.
The application of the mitigation hierarchy should be proportionate to the scale,
nature and significance of the potential impact and informed by appropriate
evidence.
B. Compensation Measures
Compensation measures will only be supported where it has been clearly
demonstrated that:
• avoidance and mitigation are not reasonably achievable;
• residual effects cannot otherwise be satisfactorily addressed; and
• the proposed compensation measures are appropriate, deliverable, secured
and capable of effective long-term management.
Where appropriate, compensation and off-site measures should align with local
environmental priorities, including:
• the Warwickshire Local Nature Recovery Strategy;
• the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull Green Infrastructure Strategy; and
• the South Warwickshire Green and Blue Infrastructure and Open Space Study.
DS.1 ~ Development Management Considerations
This Policy does not override statutory or national policy tests, including biodiversity,
heritage, flood risk, and other environmental safeguards.
Policy Justification
2.2.9 This policy ensures that development delivers environmental net gain and
manages impacts on natural assets and ecosystem services in a proportionate,
evidence-based way. Natural assets are elements of nature (e.g. trees, ponds, hedges)
that work together to provide an ecosystem service. Ecosystem services are natural
processes that have wider benefits to people and the economy, such as providing
cleaner air, reducing flood risk cleaning water and providing carbon storage.
2.2.10 It applies the mitigation hierarchy from the National Planning Policy Framework
which requires development to avoid, reduce, and, only as a last resort, compensate for
significant environmental impacts. While the NPPF focuses on biodiversity, this policy
extends the same approach to other environmental assets, including green
infrastructure, landscape, and ecosystem services, where consistent with national
policy. Councils in Warwickshire are supporting local ecosystem service markets to
provide a coordinated approach to compensation. Applicants will be expected to
demonstrate that they have considered these mechanisms to deliver measurable
environmental benefits.
2.2.11 Compensation can be provided on-site or off-site and should align with local
priorities including the Warwickshire Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS),
Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull Green Infrastructure Strategy, and the South
Warwick