What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
Policy Guidance
Introduction
This guidance is written to assist understanding and implementation of the housing
policies within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. It should be read in conjunction with
the relevant housing policies and associated explanatory text.
Housing Requirements
Amount of Affordable Housing
The amount of affordable housing required on new developments is set out in
policy HO.3 for general needs housing and policy HO.6 for Specialised Housing. The
matters below cover circumstances that may affect the amount of affordable housing a
site is expected to deliver.
Subdivision
Where the site is a subdivision of a larger site or adjacent to another potential housing
site, the site size for threshold purposes will be taken to be the larger development
site. Therefore, where a site has been subdivided, or is in separate ownerships, the site
size will be that of all the sites taken together.
In determining whether two or more adjacent development sites should be considered
as one, the following will be considered:
• whether a previous application incorporated parts of both sites;
• whether the sites are inter -dependent in any way – for example, functionally
or physically;
• whether there is a community of interest between the two owners; and/or
• whether there is a reasonable prospect of developing both sites together
When applying the applicable affordable housing thresholds, regards will be had to the
density of the development as well as the numbers of units proposed. For example, there
may be instances where a scheme is judged to have an inappropriate density in ord er
to circumvent the policy requirement. In such cases the Local Planning Authority may
refuse the application if the density of the development is contrary to local and national
policy.
Vacant Building Credit
In accordance with paragraph 65 of the NPPF , to support the re -use of brownfield land,
where vacant buildings are being reused or redeveloped, any affordable housing
contribution due will be reduced by a proportionate amount, equivalent to the existing
gross floorspace of the existing buildings. This calculation should be submitted to
the Local Planning Authority for approval at the point of application.
This Vacant Building Credit (VBC) does not apply to vacant buildings which have been
abandoned or have been vacated for the sole purpose of redevelopment. VBC can be
applied for on sites that demolish a vacant building to make way for housing
development, and for applications bring a vacant building back to use as dwellings.
The proportion of the vacant building floor space as part of the total new floor space
should be used to calculate the proportion of the affordable housing required by the
policy, as summarised in the simple formula:
(Net change in Floorspace/Proposed Floorspace) x Policy Requirement = Site Affordable
Housing Requirement
Illustrative example:
• A proposed new development for 100 homes (with a floor space of 125 sqm each)
results in total proposed floor space of 12,500 sqm.
• Policy H2 requires 40% affordable housing – which equates to 40 affordable
homes and 60 market homes.
• However, there are existing vacant buildings on the site with a floorspace of 5,000
sqm.
• The difference between the gross floorspace of the vacant buildings and the
proposes new build floor space is 7500 sqm
• Therefore the affordable Housing requirement on this site is (7500/12500)*40 =
24%. This equates to 24 dwellings.
Viability and Viability Negotiations
It is expected that developers will be aware of their obligations in respect of affordable
housing, and other planning requirements, at the outset of a development and that the
financial implications of these will have been taken into account prior to negotiations on
the purchase of the land.
Where applicants claim that they are unable to provide the proportion of affordable
housing required by the applicable policy because this would make the scheme unviable,
the Local Planning Authority will require written evidence of the costs of the
scheme. The Local Planning Authority will ask their independent viability expert to review
the applicant’s submission, the reasonable costs of which will be paid by
the applicant. The viability process should be undertaken in accordance with the
relevant Planning Practice Guidance and be publicly available.
In cases where the Local Planning Authority are satisfied that a scheme would not
be viable with the policy required level of affordable housing, officers will negotiate with
the applicant on the most appropriate solutions, with a focus on maintaining delivery of
social rent homes where practical. In doing so, they will consider the affordable housing
priorities in that location and the nature of the overall development.
Tenure
The starting point for determining the appropriate tenure mix for a site will be policy
H0.4 however the final decision as to the most appropriate affordable housing tenure
profile on any particular site will be informed by local need, the existing afforda ble
housing stock profile and commitments, market conditions and a host of external factors
beyond the remit and scope of the planning system (e.g. welfare reform). Early advice on
the most appropriate tenure mix should be sought from the Housing Team at the Local
Planning Authority and deviations from the policy will require robust justification. It is also
essential to consult potential partner Registered Providers at pre-application stage.
Total affordable housing costs (rents and sale prices together with any applicable service
charges) must be set at levels that will ensure that the accommodation is genuinely
affordable to all households on low incomes, including those in work and/or with special
needs. It also needs to take into account the size and type of homes to be
provided, not only their tenure.
All affordable tenure profiles will only be considered acceptable if they:
• Foster the development of cohesive and stable communities;
• Ensure the needs of households are met by ensuring housing costs are
genuinely affordable;
• Ensure that any homes provided remain affordable for future eligible households
(unless subsidy recycling arrangements apply);
• Include delivery arrangements to ensure the delivery of all agreed affordable
tenures within any given scheme.
Size
Applicants should aim to adhere to the dwelling size mix set out in policy HO.1. Where
applicants propose an alternative mix that departs from that shown in the policy, the
onus will be on the applicant to fully justify any such deviation. Applicants will be
expected to include the following information and evidence (to the extent that it is
relevant in any particular case and either available to the applicant or otherwise in the
public domain) as part of any justification:
• A comparison table illustrating the difference between the proposed mix and
the optimum mix set out in policy HO.1 and indicating the extent of
any deviation in terms of both the number of units and percentages;
• Evidence of local market circumstances (including local supply and demand and
factors such as sale prices and speed of sales for different sizes of dwelling);
• Evidence of projected likely future demand/aspirations of house buyers in relation
to bedroom numbers;
• Evidence of site/development-specific issues that affect the mix;
• Evidence from up to date Housing Needs Surveys;
• Evidence from any relevant Neighbourhood Development Plan, Parish Appraisal
or Parish Plan;
• For large scale schemes with a lengthy build programme over several phases – any
proposals to include a ‘review mechanism’ to allow the mix to be adjusted as
necessary for forthcoming phases.
This list is not intended to be exhaustive. In circumstances where variations to the
preferred mix are proposed, the Local Planning Authority may appoint suitably qualified
consultants to appraise the validity of the information submitted. Applicants will be
expected to pay the Authority’s reasonable costs for such an appraisal.
Implementation
For outline applications, a table indicating the range of market and (if required)
affordable dwellings types proposed should be submitted with the application. It shall be
accompanied by a reasoned justification (containing information and evidence as
outlined above) if this is to depart from the preferred mix as set out in the Table above.
For full or Reserved Matters applications, a schedule containing an analysis of the range
of market and (if required) affordable types proposed should be submitted with the
application. It shall be accompanied by a reasoned justification containing information
and evidence as outlined above if the number of any particular size of home results in a
percentage falling outside any of the ranges as set out in policy H01.
Design of Affordable Housing
The proper integration of different housing tenures within individual sites is an integral
aspect of good planning, and one means by which sustainable and successful
development can be assured. The outcome should be the physical and social integration
of a ffordable and market housing within any given site, so as to promote community
cohesion. 100% affordable housing schemes should be integrated into the wider site/
settlement and a mix of affordable tenures.
Design
To ensure that market and affordable homes are functionally and visually
indistinguishable, the following considerations should be applied to both market and
affordable homes:
• Size and type of home - ensuring a balanced stock profile of both affordable and
market homes will assist in their integration. For example, groups of small
affordable homes in lengthy terraces in the context of larger detached market
houses would usually be inappropriate;
• External materials - both market and affordable homes should be built in the same
general style and materials (including boundary and surface treatments);
• External and garden spaces - the same type of market and affordable homes
should have the same amount of external space;
• Access arrangements - affordable homes should use the same highway access as
market homes and buildings must not have separate entrances for affordable and
market residents;
• Parking – the same type of market and affordable homes should have the same
siting and level of car and cycle parking.
Layout
Policy HO.4 requires affordable homes to be ‘dispersed across the site in clusters
appropriate to the size, scale and layout of the development’. The size of such clusters
will depend on the overall size of the scheme but should generally be no more than 8-10
units.
In the case of outline planning applications – where the detailed layout and appearance
of a site will not necessarily be known – a masterplan (or similar) should indicate how the
above considerations will be taken account of in the subsequent detailed des ign
process. Where necessary, planning obligations will contain a maximum size for clusters
of affordable homes, unless justified by reference to specific circumstances and with the
agreement of the Local Planning Authority. Flats and specialised housing w ill be given
special consideration.
Delivery of Affordable Housing
Application Requirements
All planning applications that include affordable homes must be accompanied by
an Affordable Housing Statement. This should include confirmation that the applicant is
prepared to enter into a planning obligation based on the Local Planning
Authority’s model Section 106 clauses.
For Full and Reserved Matters applications, the Affordable Housing Statement must
include confirmation that the estate layout and detailed design of all dwellings proposed
as affordable homes has been discussed with, and is considered satisfactory by, a
named partner Registered Provider.
On Site Affordable Housing
Section 106 Agreement
The delivery and management of affordable housing will be secured through a planning
obligation which is commonly known as a Section 106 Agreement. Experience has shown
that the use of planning conditions has been unsatisfactory.
For details of the affordable housing clauses please contact the Local Planning
Authority.
Amongst other matters, the planning obligation will set out:
• The overall proportion or number of affordable homes to be provided
(determined in accordance with Policy HO.3);
• The overall tenure profile of the proposed affordable homes;
• That the site developer submits for approval by the Local Planning
Authority an Affordable Housing Specification for all the agreed affordable
housing. The specification is a mechanism for determining key delivery and
management details, including the identity of the Registered Provider who is to
develop or partner the development of the scheme;
• For outline applications, this Specification must be submitted and approved prior
to the approval of consequential Reserved Matters application.
• For full applications, the Specification must be submitted and approved prior to
the commencement of development;
• A requirement to deliver all the affordable homes, irrespective of tenure, and
trigger points for their delivery.
Registered Provider Involvement
The preference is for affordable housing to be delivered through Registered
Providers (RPs). The early involvement of RPs will expedite the delivery of affordable
homes and minimize the risk of RPs not taking on the homes because the detailed design
and specification of the homes does not meet their requirements.
It is recognised that the identity of the named partner Registered Provider may change
between the submission of the Affordable Housing Statement and the submission of the
Affordable Housing specification.
Nomination Rights
All affordable homes must only be let or sold to tenants or purchasers with a need for
such accommodation. Local Authorities currently have the right to nominate tenants
(within a set period of time) to all Social Rent and Affordable Rent properties. Shared
ownership properties can be sold directly by Registered Providers and Fixed Equity sale
properties (as defined in the Glossary) can be sold directly by the developer. For all other
affordable housing tenures, the Local Authorities reserve the right to determine whether
it will make nominations to the properties.
Irrespective of who is letting or selling affordable homes, all the affordable homes must
be let to tenants or sold to purchasers who satisfy at least one local connection criterion
defined with reference to:
• Residency at the time of birth;
• Current and immediate past residency for a minimum period;
• Previous residency for a minimum period;
• Current work location subject to minimum qualifying periods;
• Current close family residency for a minimum period.
Precise local connection criteria requirements will be set by the relevant Council and
defined through Section 106 agreements. The order in which local connection criteria
take precedence will be defined in cascades set by the relevant Council.
Local Lettings Plans will be required at the discretion of each Council taking into
account the particular context and circumstances of a development. Where
required, a Local Lettings Plan will set out key operational nomination and allocation
arrangements (and possibly sales arrangements). The Local Lettings Plan must
be submitted and approved prior to the occupation of any of the properties to which they
relate. The Plans can be varied from time-to-time by agreement.
The Local Authorities reserve the right to amend nomination rights as required.
Phasing
To ensure affordable housing is built alongside the market housing and not
delayed relative to the market housing, the Local Planning Authorities will use trigger
clauses in Section 106 agreements. For example, it may be required that no more than
50% of the open market dwellings shall be occupied until 50% of the affordable houses
are ready for occupation. The trigger points to be used will be determined by the Local
Planning Authority.
Off Site Contributions / Commuted Sums
As part of the aim to deliver mixed and sustainable communities that cater for a range of
accommodation needs, types and tenures, the Local Planning Authority will seek to
provide affordable housing on -site alongside general market housing. This approach is
endorsed in the NPPF . The requirement for on -site provision is also borne out of the
obligation to meet affordable housing needs given the practical challenges and ris ks
associated with delivering affordable homes via off-site contributions. These difficulties
include:
• The need to find suitable land or property to purchase for delivery of alternative
provision, including the risks, uncertainty and delay involved with sourcing sites
or properties on the open market;
• The need to prepare and submit schemes for approval within the budget provided
by any such contribution, and to ensure that the value of contributions are not
eroded by inflation;
• The limitations and risks associated with open -market purchases of
existing dwellings;
• The time and resources required to design and secure the necessary planning
permissions for new build housing schemes, and attendant risks.
Where it is considered appropriate to accept a financial contribution in lieu of onsite
affordable housing delivery, either in accordance with the provisions of
policy H0.3 or because of site specific matters, the Local Planning Authority will apply
the guidance below.
Calculating Off-Site Contributions
Contributions for off-site affordable housing provision will be calculated on the principle
of securing equivalence of provision at parity. This will:
• Ensure equitability and no inadvertent incentive to favour off-site provision; and
• Provide an additional safeguard against the erosion in value of any contribution.
Further details on how off-site contributions will be calculated will be included in future
Technical Guidance.
Implementation
All financial contributions will be secured via a Section 106 Agreement. Contributions
will be made available to support off -site provision anywhere within the Local Planning
Authority’s administrative area.
As with other financial contributions, it is good practice for a Section 106 Agreement to
include provision for repayment of affordable housing contributions not expended or
committed beyond a certain time-limit. Given (a) the risks and uncertainties associated
with accepting off -site financial contributions and (b) the importance in ensuring
flexibility over decisions on deployment to ensure good value for money, it is important
the time limit is realistic. Therefore contributions will be refundable only if not spent or
contractually committed within a period of 10 years from the date of last receipt.
Indexation will be applied to any contribution in line with future Technical Guidance to be
published separately.
The financial contribution (which may be phased on large developments) will be payable
on first occupation, sale or letting (whichever shall occur first) of any dwelling within the
relevant development unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning Authority.
Rural Exception Sites
Local Connection
Housing Need Surveys
Housing need surveys are intended to identify the housing needs of a community at a
point in time. It is important that surveys show evidence of housing need rather than
housing aspirations.
Local Connection
A key feature of Rural Exception Sites is that they provide homes to local people. To
ensure that the homes remain available to people with a local connection to the parish,
a planning obligation/legal agreement will be required to control who is eligible to occupy
the homes, amongst other matters. The input of the local community will
be sought on appropriate local connection criteria. However, for consistency and ease of
administration, the following criteria are recommended and will be applied unless a
Neighbourhood Plan expressly requires the use of alternative criteria (note, only one
person in the household needs to have a local connection):
• Was born in the parish where the site is located or whose parent(s) were ordinarily
residents in that parish at the time of birth;
• Currently lives in the parish and has done so for at least the past twelve months;
• Used to live in the parish and did so for a continuous period of not less than
three years;
• Currently works in the parish and has done so for at least the past twelve months
and for an average of not less than 16 hours per week;
• Currently has a close family member (i.e. mother, father, brother, sister, son,
daughter) living in the parish and has done so for a continuous period of not less
than three years.
Cascade clauses may be applied to, for example, give priority to households within a
parish before extending eligibility to neighbouring parishes and the whole district.
The tenure and occupancy of all affordable and all local market homes will be controlled
in perpetuity via a planning obligation. This will normally be drafted using standard model
clauses prepared by the Local Planning Authority. Such controls will apply to
all first and subsequent occupants, except in a few tightly defined circumstances. At
least one member of every household will be required to satisfy one or more ‘local
connection’ criteria.
In the case of ‘local market’ properties, the local connection requirement will apply in
relation to the host parish only but with a waiver mechanism to appropriately manage
development risk. Where local market housing is to be provided, the planning obligation
will also specify special procedures for the marketing and sale of the properties
concerned on both initial sale and subsequent re-sales.
Scale
It is not possible to define ‘small -scale’ as it will vary upon individual circumstances.
However, in applying the ‘requirements’ criteria in Policy HO.5, the Local Planning
Authority will take into account the in -principle support in the Local Plan for Rural
Exception Sites including the fact that the scheme is meeting an identified need and the
fact that it has the support of the parish or town council. Given that Rural
Exception Sites are supported in locations otherwise considered unsuitable for open -
market housing, the scale of the proposed scheme is unlikely to be the dominant
determining factor in granting or refusing planning consent. This is particularly relevant
given the likelihood of ‘cluster schemes’ (see below).
Cluster Schemes
Ordinarily, local needs will be met in the parish or settlement where they arise. However,
the reality of bringing Rural Exception Sites to fruition means that it is not always possible
to achieve this (for example because of the availability of land, comp lexities of funding,
economics of development etc.). As such, if supported by the parish or town council,
needs arising from more than one location may be grouped i.e. clustered on a single site
and met through a single Local Needs Scheme.
The principle of cluster schemes is supported by paragraph 83 of the NPPF .
Supporting Information for Planning Applications
In addition to the normal requirements in respect of accompanying documentation, it is
especially important that the application is accompanied by:
• A statement explaining the evidence of local need that has been relied upon as
providing the basis for the proposed scheme;
• Evidence of the support of the local community, including pre-application
community consultation and engagement;
• An undertaking to enter into a planning obligation (Section 106 Agreement) to
regulate the development and its future use/occupation.
Specialised Housing
Careful consideration is necessary when planning for specialised housing as such
schemes often have specific planning requirements that differ from general housing.
Such requirements must be considered in the context of both the day-to-day needs of the
occupiers themselves and the service providers who cater and care for those living in
specialised accommodation.
Policy HO.6 sets out four criteria that schemes promoting specialised housing must
meet; all the criteria must be met. Further guidance on the interpretation and
implementation of these criteria is detailed below.
1. Meets identified needs and maintains the balance of the housing stock
Schemes for specialised housing must reflect the development strategy set out in the
Plan. Schemes providing for the wider needs of South
Warwickshire should be located in the main towns. Schemes for specialised housing
should not generally be located in the smaller settlements unless they are meeting a
specific and identified local need.
Within settlements, the cumulative impact of schemes for specialised housing will be
considered. Schemes should not result in an over -concentration of provision in a
particular local area to the detriment of the overall balance of housing. It
is acknowledged that schemes may need to be of a certain size to be viable.
However, unless a scheme is meeting a need that is unlikely to be met elsewhere, such a
consideration will not usually be sufficient to outweigh any concerns regarding the
balance of the housing stock.
In order to assist in demonstrating compliance with this criteria applicants should:
• Seek pre -application advice from the Local Planning Authority, in particular
the relevant Housing Team, and consult the NHS, including the Clinical
Commissioning Group, about the impact of proposals on local healthcare
resources.
• Provide evidence to justify the need for a scheme.
• Explain how the proposed scheme will complement existing accommodation
within the District.
2. Relates well to the settlement and provides easy access to services and
facilities
Accessibility is a key issue when considering schemes for specialised housing. Residents
of specialised housing are:
• More likely to have health problems or disabilities;
• More likely to have mobility difficulties;
• More likely to suffer from social isolation;
• Less likely to have active lifestyles;
• Less likely to have access to a private motor vehicle;
• More likely to place demands on welfare services.
For residents, visitors and staff, a high standard of connectivity to the host
community, and availability of and access to associated infrastructure, is essential.
Walking and cycling routes should be generally flat and cater for people with mobility and
sensory impairments. Access to public transport should be considered not only in terms
of proximity, but also the frequency and accessibility of services. Where appropriate,
arrangements should be put in place to upgrade existing off-site infrastructure.
Application of these criteria will help ensure that residents have easy access to services
and facilities and can maintain independent lifestyles for as long as possible. Aside from
the health benefits of this approach; it also reduces dependency on welfare services.
Whilst the Local Planning Authority seeks to ensure the impacts
of additional housing are mitigated by securing Section 106 planning obligations and
through the implementation of Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), it is important to
ensure that critical existing infrastructure and service providers have the capacity to deal
with increased demands for their services. This is particularly important in respect of
specialised housing for older people. Research has found that older people
place greater demands on the health service. In itself this is not a problem if local health
services are geared to manage those increased demands. It can become a problem
where demands arise on services that do not have existing capacity or do not have
capacity to meet increasing demands.
In assessing schemes for specialised accommodation, in accordance
with Policy HO.6 the Local Planning Authority will take account of the capacity of existing
health facilities as well as the views of the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and local
health service providers.
In order to assist in demonstrating compliance with these criteria, applicants should:
• Audit specialised housing schemes against the above criteria to demonstrate that
the scheme meets the needs of future residents and visitors.
• Explain in the required Design and Access Statement how the outcome of the
above audit has fed back into the design solution proposed.
3. Design is capable of meeting support and care needs
Unlike general housing, specialised housing often has specific design requirements to
meet the specific needs of occupiers. The design is integral to ensuring residents’ general
welfare and assisting them to achieve healthy lifestyles.
In particular, older people and people with disabilities in long -term permanent housing
require adequate internal and external space, level/step -free access and appropriate
landscape design. The provision of charging points for mobility scooters and
appropriately sited and sized parking bays for disability users are also other factors to
consider.
In respect of internal space, doorways and corridors should be of sufficient width to
accommodate wheelchair users and there should be sufficient space within rooms and
corridors for wheelchair users to turn 360 degrees. Rooms should not just be of
sufficient size but appropriately configured to maximise the efficient use of space. Floor
areas should be benchmarked against recognised national standards and an explanation
provided for any derogation.
Given that specialised housing is designed for occupation by vulnerable residents,
schemes that offer permanent long -term housing should also be ‘future proofed’ as far
as practical to take account of the fact that residents’ support and care needs are likely
to change over time.
In order to assist in demonstrating compliance with these criteria, applicants should:
• Describe how the proposed design of the scheme will ensure fitness of purpose in
relation to its proposed role, including reference to the relevant accessibility
standards.
• Describe how the proposed management of the scheme will ensure fitness of
purpose in relation to its proposed role and that of the host settlement.
4. Delivery of appropriate management, support and care
The type of management, support packages and care required will vary in detail from
scheme to scheme, depending on the nature and objectives of the scheme. Further, the
detailed specification of the management, support packages and care may reasonably
be expected to change over time, in response to evolving best practice.
To assist in demonstrating compliance with these criteria, applicants should ensure a
planning application is accompanied by:
• Sufficient information to describe the intended role and function of the scheme.
• Heads of terms for an appropriate planning obligation to be secured via a
Section 106 legal agreement
In every case, a planning obligation will be sought that includes provisions to secure the
delivery of appropriate management and/or support packages and/or care relevant to the
type of scheme proposed. Provisions will include:
• Requirements in respect of the range of facilities and services the operator will be
required to provide and retain on site.
• Restrictions on the occupancy of all residential units within a schem