The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This section sets out road safety requirements and the reasoning behind them. In urban areas, residential streets should be designed for 20mph, with continuous footpaths and cycleways connecting to the surrounding network. In rural areas, new accesses need good visibility and speed reduction where necessary, with the needs of horse riders and farm vehicles considered. Warwickshire County Council aims to cut deaths and serious injuries on its roads by 50% by 2030, working towards zero by 2050.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
Road Safety
A. Requirements
1. Proposals will be supported where it can be demonstrated that they will not
compromise highway safety, including during construction. Where residual
impacts on the capacity and operation of the highway network are identified,
these must be appropriately mitigated to acceptable levels in accordance with
the highways authority’s operational standards.
2. For proposals that would generate significant travel in a sensitive location, or
where crash data indicates existing safety concerns, development proposals
must:
i. Be designed in accordance with the ‘Safe System Approach’ principles,
incorporating safe road design, appropriate speed management, and
infrastructure that supports safe road user behaviour, contributing to
Warwickshire County Council’s Vision Zero ambition.
ii. Adhere to the hierarchy of road users through prioritizing safety,
accessibility and convenience of pedestrians, cyclists, public transport
users, and other vulnerable road users in accordance with the user
hierarchy established in LTN 1/20 and Manual for Streets. Cycleways
would normally be expected to have priority across side roads.
3. Where appropriate development proposals must be subject to independent
Road Safety Audits, undertaken in accordance with GG119 (or successor
standards), with identified issues addressed and agreed with the local
Highways Authority. For major development, the Local Planning Authority may
require post-implementation monitoring of road safety outcomes with further
mitigation to be delivered where necessary.
4. Safety measures and infrastructure must be capable of being maintained for
the lifetime of the development, with arrangements for adoption or ongoing
management clearly set out.
B. Urban Environments
1. In accordance with WCC's Design Guide, 20mph compliant horizontal designs
should be delivered as part of residential design proposals for non-spine roads.
A 20mph limit will normally be appropriate and the development shall
contribute to the necessary costs of any Traffic Regulation Order.
2. Proposals must integrate continuous footpaths/cycleways to maintain network
connectivity with the surrounding area at all junctions where these connect with
the existing road network.
3. Development should provide safe pedestrian and cycle routes to nearby
services and facilities.
C. Rural Environments
1. Proposals must ensure that new site access on rural roads provides appropriate
visibility splays and are well designed for existing road characteristics. Speed
reduction measures must be implemented where necessary to ensure safe
access.
2. Where crash data or safety audits identify collision risks or roadside hazards in
the vicinity of the development, appropriate mitigation measures must be
implemented.
3. Development should provide safe pedestrian and cycle routes to nearby
services and facilities, recognizing the constraints of rural settings.
Development proposals must also consider the needs of horse riders,
agricultural vehicles and other rural road users, providing mitigation where
conflict or safety risk is identified.
Policy Justification
7.5.7 A key requirement for development proposals under the National Planning Policy
Framework is to ensure that safe and suitable access to sites is provided for all users. In
addition, Warwickshire County Council have set out in their Local Transport Plan 4
(2024-2050) the ambitious goal of reducing the number of people killed or seriously
injured on Warwickshire’s roads by 50% by 2030. With further ambition to work towards
zero serious casualties or deaths on Warwickshire’s roads by 2050.
7.5.8 To achieve this, all developments must contribute positively to road safety
through ensuring safe access, implementing internal traffic calming measures, and
mitigating the impacts of additional vehicle movements in the surrounding area. South
Warwickshire encompasses both heavily urbanized areas within the Warwick
conurbation and South of Coventry, and more rural areas elsewhere, particularly in the
countryside of the Stratford-upon-Avon District. Given this diverse range of settings, the
policy tailors requirements reflect local context and characteristics.
7.5 .9 SWLP Policy ID.5 requires Travel Plans and Transport Assessments for
appropriate scale of development. These documents must demonstrate how the
development will achieve safe access and movement for all users during both
construction and operation stages. The approach to highway safety should be clearly
set out in planning applications, and agreed with Warwickshire County Council, to
ensure schemes are designed to eliminate or minimize road safety risks.
7.5.10 All major developments are required to incorporate a ‘Safe System’ approach to
support Warwickshire County Council’s vision zero goals. The safe system approach
recognizes that humans make mistakes and seek to create a transport system that
protects people when errors occur. Whilst some elements of the Safe system are
outside the scope of land use planning, development proposals must demonstrate how
they will deliver:
Safe Roads: Infrastructure designed to prevent crashes and minimize harm when
collisions occur, through visibility and street design.
Safe Speeds: Speed environments appropriate to the road function, achieved through
good design rather than enforcement alone.
Safe Road Users: Ensuring that infrastructure supports safe behaviours, including clear
sightlines, legible street layouts, accessible crossing and separation of vulnerable users
from motor traffic where appropriate.
7.5.11 This approach requires adherence to the hierarchy of road users a principle
embedded in national guidance including the Manual for Streets and Local Transport
Note 1/20. This hierarchy mandates that design decisions must first and foremost
protect the safety, accessibility, and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists, aligning
with the design response to the lowest risk modes of transport.
7.5.12 In urban environments, 20mph speed limits in residential areas play a crucial
role in protecting vulnerable road users. Evidence demonstrates that reducing speeds
from 30mph to 20mph reduces the risk of pedestrian casualties, whilst also
encouraging modal shift to active transport, due to associated increases in highway
safety1. To be effective, these limits must be provided alongside physical street design
that creates physical priority for pedestrians and safety. This is to ensure that driver
behaviour aligns with safe speeds without solely relying on fear of enforcement to
prompt change.
In rural environments, existing roads often operate at higher speeds (typically national
speed limit of 60mph). The safe system principle of a forgiving roadside, one that
minimizes injury severity when vehicles leave the carriageway, is therefore particularly
important. Development proposals must include proactive road safety assessments of
site access points, and the immediate highway approaches. Where risks are identified,
appropriate mitigation must be implemented which may include hazard removal or
protection, improved visibility splays or measures to reduce approach speeds. This
approach recognizes that while eliminat