The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This section sets out the landscape character policy in full and its justification. Development must avoid visually intrusive locations, protect openness, tranquillity and rural character, and show that alternative sites and designs were considered. Assessments must follow Landscape Institute guidance and cover cumulative, seasonal and night-time effects. The reasoning is that landscape-led design, informed by the Landscape Character Assessment, prevents harm from the outset rather than relying on mitigation added later, with requirements scaled to the sensitivity of each location.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
.16
Protecting, Enhancing and Restoring Landscape Character
A. Landscape Character and Enhancement
Development proposals must:
1. Demonstrate how they have been informed by and respond positively to the local
distinctiveness and historic character of South Warwickshire’s diverse
landscapes, including the relevant Landscape Character Area descriptions and
management guidelines.
2. Protect landscape character and avoid adverse effects on features that
contribute to the character, history or setting of a settlement or landscape.
3. Incorporate measures to enhance and where appropriate, restore the landscape
character of the locality, proportionate to the scale of development and
contribute where relevant to wider green and blue infrastructure and nature
recovery objectives.
4. Development layout, design and masterplanning must be landscape led,
demonstrate how the landscape context has shaped the form, density,
orientation, movement network, open space structure and overall design
approach from the earliest stages and supported an early-stage landscape
appraisal that demonstrates how landscape considerations have shaped the
design from inception
5. Must be sensitive to an area’s capacity for change, acknowledge cumulative
effects and guard against the potential for coalescence between existing
settlements
B. Minimising Visual Impacts
1. A proportionate Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) will
be required for all major developments (as defined in the NPPF), proposals over
0.5ha or those that affect the setting of heritage assets.
2. Development that would result in harm to the existing landscape, will only be
supported if it can be demonstrated that the harm is unavoidable
and outweighed by wider public benefits. Any harm to such features must be
clearly justified and shown to be unavoidable, with appropriate
mitigation secured.
3. New landscaping must be incorporated to reduce predicted visual effects and
enhance the existing landscape using native and locally characteristic species.
Planting should be implemented at the earliest practicable stage and provision
for long term establishment, management and maintenance must be secured
through planning conditions or obligations.
4. Development must avoid locations where it would appear visually intrusive or
harm the openness, tranquillity or rural character of the area, particularly where
these qualities are identified as key characteristics of the relevant LCAs.
5. Proposals must demonstrate that key viewpoints and public visual receptors
have been assessed, that alternative siting or design options have been
considered and that measures have been incorporated to reduce visual
prominence, including avoiding skyline intrusion or excessive landform
alterations.
DS.16 ~ Development Management Considerations
In relation to Part A1 of the Policy ~ Landscape Character Area descriptions and
management guidelines set out the special characteristics of the landscape
character areas and provide guidelines which provide invaluable strategies for
managing and enhancing these landscapes.
In relation to Part B1 of the Policy - LVIAs must follow current Landscape Institute
guidance and assess effects on relevant LCAs, key visual receptors, and public
viewpoints, including cumulative effects, seasonal variation, and where relevant
nighttime impacts.
Policy Justification
2.12.1 The landscapes of South Warwickshire are a defining feature of
its character, identity and environmental quality. Development must be informed by and
respond positively to; the distinctive landscape character identified in the Landscape
Character Assessment and related evidence. Development should be designed
and located in a way that conserves and enhances landscape qualities, minimises
adverse effects, and contributes to the restoration and strengthening of landscape
features. In considering proposals, attention will be given not only to individual impacts
but also to the cumulative effects of development on the character and quality of the
wider landscape.
2.12.2 South Warwickshire’s landscapes are a defining environmental and cultural
asset. National policy requires planning decisions to recognise the intrinsic character
and beauty of the countryside, protect valued landscapes, conserve heritage assets
and their settings and reinforce local distinctiveness. The Landscape Character
Assessment provides a detailed understanding of the districts varied landscapes
including landform vegetation patterns settlement form historic field patterns key views
and areas of high sensitivity.
2.12.3 Landscape led design is essential to ensuring that development responds to
landform key views settlement patterns and landscape sensitivities from the
outset rather than relying on retrofitted mitigation. This approach ensures that
development reinforces local distinctiveness, respects settlement patterns, and avoids
avoidable harm to landscape character and visual amenity.
2.12.4 Requiring proportionate Landscape and Visual Impact Assessments (LVIA) for
major development, larger sites and proposals in sensitive locations ensures that
landscape and visual effects are properly understood including
cumulative seasonal perceptual and nighttime impacts. This evidence is essential to
shaping siting scale layout and design to avoid or minimise harm and where possible
deliver landscape enhancement or restoration. The policy applies proportionality with
requirements scaled to the sensitivity of the location and the nature of the proposal.
2.12.5 This policy therefore provides a robust, evidence-based framework to protect,
enhance and restore the districts landscape character, settlement patterns and visual
amenity for the future generation, wh