Green Belt & countryside

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the South Warwickshire Local Plan, prepared jointly by Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick District Councils to guide where and how new homes, jobs and infrastructure are built up to 2050. It describes an area of 488 square miles, mostly open countryside, containing towns such as Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwick and Royal Leamington Spa. Nearly a third of the area lies in the West Midlands Green Belt and 8% falls within the Cotswolds National Landscape. The area is a gateway to the West Midlands, with its strongest links to Coventry.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section describes South Warwickshire today. The area covers 488 square miles of mainly open countryside across the two districts, including towns such as Alcester, Kenilworth, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick. It has good motorway and rail links between London and Birmingham, and 8% of it lies within the Cotswolds National Landscape. Nearly a third sits in the West Midlands Green Belt, which is designed to prevent urban sprawl. The area's strongest ties are with Coventry, as part of the Coventry and Warwickshire sub-region.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the plan's approach to development in the countryside. It recognises that many of South Warwickshire's economic generators sit outside the main urban areas, so the plan supports existing rural businesses and communities to keep growing, in line with the South Warwickshire Economic Strategy. It also supports a number of Major Investment Sites, which are existing large employment sites of regional and national significance that the plan seeks to safeguard and grow.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy supports certain types of housing in the countryside, outside allocated sites and settlement boundaries. It allows rural exception affordable housing led by local communities, small self-build and custom-build schemes, and conversions of redundant brick or stone buildings that are listed or of historic merit. It also supports replacement dwellings, homes tied to agricultural or rural businesses where a functional need is proven, small expansions of existing mobile home and Traveller sites, and new single homes of exceptional quality and design.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section gives the full Rural Housing policy with its detailed conditions and justification. Before a historic building can become a home, evidence of robust marketing for business use is needed, and homes tied to rural businesses require a business plan, occupancy conditions and functional and financial tests. The justification notes that rural services have declined, public transport is poor or absent in many villages, and house prices are out of reach for many rural workers, so the plan aims to balance protecting the countryside with meeting local needs, including affordable housing.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the West Midlands Green Belt. It explains that the Green Belt exists to keep land open and prevent urban sprawl, meaning unplanned development, so sites allocated in the plan do not count as sprawl. Green Belt is not a landscape designation and can include both greenfield and brownfield land. In line with national policy, grey belt sites, which are lower-performing areas of Green Belt, may be suitable for development.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets out where the Green Belt boundary will change to make room for the plan's proposals. Six villages, including Bubbenhall, Claverdon and Snitterfield, are taken out of the Green Belt. Land is also removed for new settlements and major growth sites at places such as Hatton, Kenilworth South, Leamington Spa North, South of Coventry and Coventry Airport, plus smaller sites at Alcester, Hampton Magna, Kenilworth, Studley and Stoneleigh. A boundary error at Leek Wootton is also corrected.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the Green Belt changes in full. It allows neighbourhood plans to release small Green Belt sites for local needs where strict conditions are met. National policy applies to proposals both in and out of the Green Belt, and the Golden Rules on affordable housing do not apply to land released under the older 2016 and 2017 local plans. A Green Belt Review found exceptional circumstances justify the changes, because many of the most sustainable growth locations sit within the Green Belt.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy limits development in the Cotswolds National Landscape to meeting local needs only. It will not be used to meet wider South Warwickshire needs or unmet needs from neighbouring areas. Proposals must conserve and enhance the area's natural beauty, special qualities, cultural and natural heritage and tranquillity, including dark skies. They must be sensitively located and designed, and show all reasonable steps have been taken to further the purpose of conserving the landscape. Development needed to conserve or manage the National Landscape will be supported.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full policy and reasoning for protecting the Cotswolds National Landscape. Proposals must follow the area's Management Plan, avoid cumulative harm, stay proportionate in scale, and in exceptional cases show public benefits outweigh harm. Schemes within the 3km buffer must consult the National Landscape Board. The area, formerly the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, covers 8.2% of South Warwickshire. Councils have a legal duty to seek to further its conservation, and national policy gives great weight to protecting it.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the plan's approach to protecting valued landscapes. It says great weight will be given to conserving the Cotswolds National Landscape, including harm caused by development outside its boundary that affects views to or from it. A 3km buffer around the National Landscape is shown on the Policies Map. It also notes that South Warwickshire contains several other distinctive local landscapes that shape the character of its countryside and settlements.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects five Special Landscape Areas: Arden, Cotswold Fringe, Feldon Parkland, Ironstone Hills Fringe, and River Leam and Surrounds. These are locally designated areas of high landscape quality shown on the Policies Map. Development that would harm their distinctive character and appearance, including their historic and cultural features, will be resisted. The cumulative effect of several developments will be considered, and schemes in settlements within these areas must respect how the settlement historically sits in the landscape.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains why Special Landscape Areas are designated. National policy supports protecting the natural landscape, and these designations protect the best countryside outside the Cotswolds National Landscape. The five areas were identified through a landscape study and represent particularly high quality countryside at a district level. The section notes that all landscapes matter, but labelling the whole of South Warwickshire as special would undermine the point of picking out specific areas for their landscape and scenic quality.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires development to protect, enhance and where appropriate restore landscape character. Schemes must respond to local Landscape Character Area descriptions, be landscape led from the earliest design stage, and guard against settlements merging together. A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment is required for all major developments, sites over 0.5 hectares, or schemes affecting heritage settings. Harm to the landscape is only acceptable where it is unavoidable and outweighed by public benefits, and new planting must use native, locally characteristic species with long-term maintenance secured.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the landscape character policy in full and its justification. Development must avoid visually intrusive locations, protect openness, tranquillity and rural character, and show that alternative sites and designs were considered. Assessments must follow Landscape Institute guidance and cover cumulative, seasonal and night-time effects. The reasoning is that landscape-led design, informed by the Landscape Character Assessment, prevents harm from the outset rather than relying on mitigation added later, with requirements scaled to the sensitivity of each location.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects the gaps between settlements so that towns and villages keep their separate identities. Development that would erode a gap's function will be refused unless no reasonable alternative site exists outside it. Schemes must preserve openness and the sense of leaving one place before entering another, avoid urbanising features such as lighting and access roads, and be assessed alongside other development for cumulative effects. It also designates Areas of Restraint, shown on the Policies Map, where the open character of land must not be harmed.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the settlement gap policy and its reasoning. In Areas of Restraint, large-scale development will only be permitted where it brings clear community benefits, supports the plan's objectives, and no suitable alternative site exists nearby. These areas are not landscape quality designations. They protect open land in and around settlements, such as river valley corridors, because of its contribution to a settlement's character and form. Agricultural and recreational uses, allotments, cemeteries and small farm additions may still be appropriate.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets when and how much affordable housing developers must provide. In Designated Rural Areas it applies to schemes of 2 or more homes or sites of 0.5 hectares or more; everywhere else it applies at 10 or more homes or 0.5 hectares. In Zone 1, at least 50% affordable housing is required on Green Belt or Cotswolds National Landscape sites and 40% elsewhere. In Zone 2 the figures are 40% and 30%. Where demolition is involved, the thresholds apply to the net increase in homes.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the detail and justification for the affordable housing requirements. Evidence identifies a need for 1,237 affordable homes a year across South Warwickshire, about 56% of the total housing need of 2,197 homes a year. On schemes of 10 or more homes, affordable housing should normally be built on site, while smaller schemes in rural areas pay a financial contribution instead. Some development types, such as holiday lets, mobile homes and residential annexes, are exempt. Affordable homes will be secured in perpetuity through Section 106 legal agreements, and requirements are subject to viability.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section gives the detailed rules and reasoning for rural exception sites. Housing need must be evidenced by a proper survey of residents, normally valid for five years, with future occupiers showing a strong local connection through birth, residence, work or family. Some market housing may be allowed to make a scheme viable or meet a surveyed local need, but never more than 50% of the homes. A Section 106 agreement will secure occupancy, tenure and long-term management. The policy exists because high prices and restricted supply make affordable housing especially hard to deliver in rural areas.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy supports self-build and custom-build housing through several routes. On large developments of 500 or more homes, 2% of dwellings must be provided as serviced self-build plots unless the councils' register shows lower demand, with plots offered at a range of costs, sizes and types and an average density of 25 homes per hectare. Standalone schemes are also supported within settlement boundaries, on suitable sites next to larger settlements outside the Green Belt or Cotswolds National Landscape, or adjoining settlements where a local community need is evidenced.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires a Landscape and Environmental Management Plan, known as a LEMP, wherever landscape mitigation, restoration or habitat creation is proposed. The plan must be secured through planning conditions or a legal agreement for at least 30 years or the full life of the development, whichever is longer. It must set clear management objectives, include baseline surveys of existing landscape and wildlife features, give detailed specifications for all planting and landscape elements, and identify who will manage the land and how it will be funded.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the landscape management policy. Management responsibility for new landscape areas will first be offered to the town or parish council, then to the local authority, with adoption plus a 30-year maintenance payment the preferred outcome. Management plans must cover monitoring, invasive species control, litter, public safety, measures against vandalism, and lighting controls to protect dark skies and rural character. The 30-year minimum period matches national biodiversity legislation and ensures improvements are sustained and adapted over time.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects agricultural land and soils. The best and most versatile farmland, Grades 1, 2 and 3a, must be protected from permanent loss wherever possible, with development steered to lower grade land (Grades 3b, 4 and 5) instead. Building on the best land is only acceptable where no suitable lower-grade alternative exists and the benefits clearly outweigh the land's long-term value for food production, climate resilience and ecosystem services. Soils must be managed sustainably, including saving and reusing topsoil during construction.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the heritage assets policy in full. It extends protection to heritage at risk, historic townscapes in places such as Kenilworth, Royal Leamington Spa, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick, historic landscapes, and assets contributing to the Cotswolds National Landscape. Applicants affecting a heritage asset or its setting must assess its significance using appropriate expertise. Substantial harm to or total loss of a designated asset will be refused unless substantial public benefits outweigh it, while lesser harm must be justified and weighed against public benefits.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects Registered Parks and Gardens and Registered Village Greens, which are formally recognised historic landscapes. Development affecting them is only supported where it conserves and enhances their historic significance, landscape character, biodiversity value and public amenity. Proposals must be landscape-led, preserve historic design and planting, deliver measurable Biodiversity Net Gain, safeguard openness and tranquillity, restore lost features where appropriate, and maintain public access. A proportionate Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy is required, plus a Heritage Impact Assessment where a designated heritage asset is affected.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the policy on historic parks, gardens and village greens. It describes them as irreplaceable historic landscapes that contribute significantly to local character, identity and biodiversity, often containing mature trees and species-rich habitats. A landscape-led approach ensures development respects historic design intent and setting. The justification notes development can also bring opportunities to reinstate lost landscape features and improve public access, and that the required assessments make sure change is well informed and well managed.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section lists the parishes designated as rural areas under the Housing (Right to Buy) (Designated Rural Areas and Designated Regions) (England) (No 2) Order 2004, as referenced in Policy HO.3. All the listed parishes, from Admington to Wootton Wawen, are in Stratford-on-Avon District. No parishes in Warwick District have this designation. The designation affects how certain affordable housing rules apply in these places.