The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This section sets out the site allocations for Bedmond. Three sites are allocated for around 138 homes in total: Church Hill Road (102 homes), 56 High Street (20 homes, with possible commercial space) and North Cott, East Lane (16 homes). All three are classed as grey belt land and remain within the Green Belt. Requirements include access improvements, heritage assessments near listed buildings, surface water flood mitigation and protection of trees covered by Tree Preservation Orders.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
BEDMOND
H12 – Church Hill Road
H12 – Church Hill Road
SHELAA Reference:
CFS56
Size: 2.9ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 102
Phasing:
0 - 10 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Greenfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
The site is grey belt. Given its location adjoining a washed over Green Belt village and grey belt
categorisation, the site has been retained in the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 102
• Provision of open space/play space is required
• The site is within the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC zone of influence. As the indicative dwelling
capacity exceeds 100 it is required to deliver suitable mitigation and / or avoidance measures in
order to address potential adverse effects arising from increased recreational disturbance. This
includes provision, improvement and / or maintenance of Suitable Alternative Natural
Greenspace (SANG) (or a suitable financial contribution towards the same). Given the limited
size of the site, a financial contribution will be required
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• There is an existing access from Church Hill Road which would require improvement works such
as widening in order to facilitate the scale of development proposed
• A Public Right of way runs along the southern boundary of the site, which must be considered
during the design process and protected
Historic Environment
• There are two Listed Buildings on the opposite side of Church Hill Road to the east of the site
(Church of the Ascension and White Hart) , which should be considered in the design of any
proposals at the site at the earliest stage. Given the proximity of the Listed Buildings, any planning
application (and preferably pre-application) would need to be accompanied by a Heritage Impact
Assessment/Heritage Statement thoroughly examining any impacts to the heritage assets
(including possible mitigation) and there should be early discussions with the conservation officer
on layout and height of development
• HCC Historic Environment advised that the site includes/has potential to include heritage assets
of archaeological interest. Any development proposals on the site should be accompanied by a
pre-application or pre-determination archaeological assessment
Flooding
• Given the site is a large greenfield site, below ground SuDS will not be accepted. All surface
water attenuation is to be delivered above-ground, with above-ground conveyance prioritised
• There is a surface water flow path at low -medium risk of surface water flooding; this flows from
the north-eastern corner to the centre of the site. Any development would need to provide suitable
mitigation to address surface water flood risk on areas of the site
Biodiversity, Green Infrastructure and TPOs
• The site is within the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC zone of influence. As the indicative dwelling
capacity exceeds 100, it is required to deliver suitable mitigation and/or avoidance measures in
order to address potential adverse effects arising from increased recreational disturbance. This
includes provision, improvement and/or maintenance of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace
(SANG) (or a suitable financial contribution towards the same). Given the limited size of the site,
a financial contribution will be required
• There are several protected trees spread around the centre of the site, and a row of protected
trees along the western boundary ( TPO901). Future development will need to take account of
these protected trees and an Arboricultural Impact Assessment will be required at the planning
application stage (and preferably pre-application stage)
Landscape
• The council’s Landscape Sensitivity Assessment classifies the site as having a medium
sensitivity to built development. A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment may be required at
the planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage
Minerals and Waste
• A Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) will be required to support any proposal at the planning
application stage
H13 – 56 High Street
H13 – 56 High Street, Bedmond
SHELAA Reference:
NSS2
Size: 0.4ha
Proposed use(s):
Mainly residential with
potential provision of
Class E Commercial
space
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 20
Phasing:
0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
The site is grey belt. Given its brownfield nature, location within a washed over Green Belt village and
grey belt categorisation, the site has been retained in the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 20
• Provision of Class E commercial space (viability dependent)
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• There is an existing vehicular access from the High Street on the western boundary of the site
which should be utilised
Flooding
• The site falls within the Groundwater Source Protection Zone 1 (GPSZ) which may limit the use
of SuDS, deep foundations and below ground development. A preliminary risk assessment is
required at the planning application stage (and preferably pre-application stage ) to determine
whether there is contamination of the site, and whether remediation works would be needed
• There is a low to high surface water flood risk to the south of the site. Suitable mitigation to
address surface water flooding and ground water flooding would be required
Historic Environment
• Grade II Listed Buildings are situated to the north and south of the site respectively. Additionally,
Locally Listed Buildings are located to the south along the High Street. Development would need
to take into consideration the heritage assets adjacent to the site. Whilst the council’s high-level
Heritage Impact Assessment considers the site to have a neutral impact on the historic
environment, a Heritage Impact Assessment/Heritage Statement would be required at the
planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage, given the proximity to heritage assets
Green Infrastructure, Biodiversity and TPOs
• There is a TPO along the southern boundary of the site (TPO371). Protected trees on the
southern boundary are required to be retained. The submission of an Arboricultural Impact
Assessment may be required at the planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage
Mineral and Waste
• HCC Mineral and Waste stated that consideration must be given to the use of material on site
through opportunistic extraction, in order to reduce the need for material to be imported
• A Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) will be required to support any proposal at the planning
application stage
H14 - North Cott, East Lane
H14 – North Cott East Lane, Bedmond
SHELAA Reference:
NSS6a
Size: 0.47ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 16
Phasing:
0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
The site is grey belt. Given its brownfield nature, location adjoining a washed over Green Belt village
and grey belt categorisation, the site has been retained in the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 16
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The existing access to the site is via a residential driveway to the northwest of the site branched
off from East Lane. There is also a gated entrance at the southwest of the site off East Lane
(although this falls outside of the red line boundary of the site)
• Following discussions with HCC highways during the allocation process, there are two access
solutions. These options are either to utilise the existing access towards the north of the site or
utilise the access beyond the south of the site. Both of these options would require improvement
works to ensure that visibility splays meet HCC Highway standards. HCC Highways have also
stated that at planning application stage they require the submission of site layouts and swept
path analysis to ensure that an emergency vehicle and refuse vehicle can enter into the site and
turn around to egress in forward gear onto the highway
• The enhancement of crossing facilities of the High Street may be expected by HCC Highways
• Early engagement with HCC Highways (including the submission of a Highways Pre -App) is
strongly recommended
Flooding
The site falls within the Groundwater Source Protection Zone 1 (GPSZ) which may limit the use
of SuDS, deep foundations and below ground development. A preliminary risk assessment is
required at the planning application stage (and preferably pre-application stage) to determine
whether there is contamination of the site, and whether remediation works would be needed
• There is a small area within the east of the site at low -medium risk of surface water flooding.
Development would be subject to appropriate mitigation measures to address the risk of surface
water flooding
Historic Environment
• There are a number of Grade II and Locally Listed Buildings along the High Street to the north
of the site A Heritage Impact Assessment/Heritage Statement would be required at the planning
application (and preferably pre-application) stage examining the potential impacts on nearby
heritage assets and possible mitigation measures
• HCC Historic Environment advised that the site includes/has potential to include heritage assets
of archaeological interest. Any development proposals on the site should be accompanied by a
pre-application or pre-determination archaeological assessment
Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity
• HCC Ecology state that illumination should be kept to a minimum to protect adjacent habitat