What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
a net zero building.
CNZ2A - Net Zero Operational Carbon in New Build Residential Development
All new build dwellings (use class C3 and C4) are required to meet the
following requirements:
A1.1 - Part L% improvement
1) At least a 63% improvement (reduction) on Part L 2021 TER (Target
Emissions Rate) from energy efficiency measures.
2) Heat pumps are to be calculated as an energy efficiency measure, rather
than a renewable energy measure.
3) As a measure in aid of this TER target, achieve an improvement
(reduction) on Part L 2021 TFEE (Target Fabric Energy Efficiency) as
follows:
End terrace: at least a 12% improvement
Mid terrace: at least a 16% improvement
Semi-detached: at least a 15% improvement
Detached: at least a 17% improvement
Bungalow: at least a 19% improvement
Flats/ apartments: at least a 24% (weighted average, whole block)
improvement
All of the above should be calculated using SAP10.2 or later version, or
the Home Energy Model (HEM, once it has been implemented)
In the event national building regulations exceed the requirements of this
policy, the national standards (i.e. the higher standards) would apply.
A1.2 - Energy metrics guidelines
Or –
4) Positive weight will be given to development proposals which can
demonstrate that the following absolute energy metrics are met:
• Total energy use: 35 kWh/m2/year
• Space heating demand: 15 kWh/m2/year
5) Performance against these targets must be evidenced using a
methodology that accurately predicts buildings’ operational energy use.
Suitable methodologies include the Passive House Planning Package
(PHPP). Where a building achieves Passivhaus certification, it will be
deemed to have complied with these targets.
A2 - No Fossil Fuels
6) The use of fossil fuels and connection to the gas grid will not be
considered acceptable. Although, the use of fossil fuels may be
considered acceptable in exceptional circumstances and will be assessed
on a case-by-case basis.
A3 - On site renewable energy
7) On-site annual renewable energy generation capacity (in kWh) at least
equal to the predicted annual total regulated and unregulated energy use
(residual energy use in kWh after A1.1 has been achieved, plus
unregulated energy use).
8) Where an on-site net zero regulated and unregulated energy balance is
not possible13, it should be demonstrated that the amount of on-site
renewable energy generation equates to at least 120kWh/m2 projected
building footprint/year.
9) Where a building in a multi-building development cannot individually
achieve the requirements of A3 this shortfall is to be made up across other
units on-site. Innovative solutions, for example utilising PV canopies on car
parks or solar PV on communal buildings should be demonstrated before
carbon offsetting A4 is considered.
10) Regulated and unregulated energy use can both be calculated with Part L
SAP or BREDEM, but a more accurate method such as PHPP is advised.
Any other proposed methods are subject to council confirmation of
acceptability.
11) The annual renewable energy generation and the annual energy use are
whole-building figures, not per-m2 figures.
12) Renewable energy output should be calculated in line with MCS guidance
for the relevant technology (expected to be PV in most cases).
A4 - Energy Offsetting
13) Only in exceptional circumstances and as a last resort where it is
demonstrably unfeasible to achieve an on-site net zero regulated and
13 Exceptional circumstances where an on-site net zero energy balance is not achieved may only be found
acceptable in some cases, for example with taller flatted buildings (4 storeys or above) or where overshadowing
significantly impacts solar PV output.
unregulated energy balance, should any shortfall in on-site renewable
energy generation that does not match energy use be offset via a S106
financial contribution, reflecting the cost of the solar PV that will need to be
delivered off-site.
14) The energy offset price shall be determined based on the cost of delivering
equivalent off-site solar PV capacity, calculated using the most up-to-date
government data on solar PV installation. The methodology will account
for capital costs, expected local energy yield, and a reasonable allowance
for the administration of the offset fund by the council or its delivery
partners. The total offset contribution shall be calculated as a one-off
payment, based on the projected annual shortfall in on-site renewable
energy generation, multiplied by the published offset price.
A5 - Reduced Performance Gap
15) An assured performance method must be implemented throughout all
phases of construction to ensure operational energy in practice performs
to predicted levels at the design stage.
A6 - Smart Energy Systems
16) Proposals should demonstrate how they have considered the difference
(in scale and time) of renewable energy generation and the on-site energy
demand, with a view to maximising on-site consumption of energy
generated on site through energy storage or smart distribution, and overall
minimising the need for wider grid infrastructure reinforcement.
A7 - Post-Occupancy Evaluation
17) Large-scale development (50 units or more) is to monitor and report total
energy use and renewable energy generation values on an annual basis.
An outline plan for the implementation of this should be submitted with the
planning application. The monitored in-use data is to be reported to the
Local Planning Authority for 5 years upon occupation.
Reasoned Justification:
8.6 As set out in the Climate Change Act 2008, national policy is working towards
achieving the legally-binding UK target of net zero by 2050 and carbon budgets are
subsequently legislated under the aegis of the act. These carbon budgets are linked
to the Climate Change Committee’s Balanced Pathway to Net Zero report, which is
supported by analysis that sets out that all new buildings must be net zero by 2025.
The 2050 net zero target is specifically referenced in the NPPF.
8.7 The Planning and Energy Act 2008 sets out that local standards for energy efficiency
in new homes are able to exceed those set in Building Regulations.
8.8 In the context of the 2023 Written Ministerial Statement, these policies are fully
compliant with the perceived constraints it poses. The WMS only applies to energy
efficiency standards where it states that any standards that exceed Building
Regulations must be done so using the TER metric. Policy A1 remains within its
bounds through the use of TER% reduction as the primary metric. The TFEE target
is not additional to, but is a step towards, that TER target.
8.9 The 63% reduction target on Part L 2021 TER is set to align with national policy in
that it is in line with the Future Homes Standard. Correspondingly, the TFEE target is
set to align with the performance of a home that achieves that TER target via the
indicative FHS specification set out by the Government in the 2019 -21 FHS
consultation. This is necessary in order to reduce the space heat demand (which is
necessary for the achievement of the UK’s carbon budgets. It is also necessary in
order to protect the resident from excessive energy bills and potential fuel poverty,
as the latest FHS consultation indicated that the FHS carbon target could be achieved
just with a heat pump and no fabric improvements, resulting in heating bills
approximately double those of a current new build home.
8.10 A2 is aligned to the Government’s direction of travel indicated by both the options
proposed in the Future Home Standard 2023 consultation, in that no fossil fuel
heating systems are proposed. In some exceptional cases the use of fossil fuels may
be acceptable, for example in remote and isolated areas. A3 and A4 are not impacted
because they address renewable energy, which is out of scope of the 2023 WMS.
8.11 Policy elements A1, A2 and A3 are to be addressed at the design and post -
completion stages, to ensure that the development has been built to intended
standards. Post-completion resubmission of the original energy statement including
energy performance calc ulations, informed by the relevant tests to systems and
fabric, should be required as a condition as part of the planning application process.
A5 and A7 compliance should also be demonstrated post -completion through
planning condition.
8.12 A1 – A7 are to be demonstrated at the planning application stage through submission
of an energy statement, which should include associated output reports from energy
modelling software (e.g. SAP, BREDEM, PHPP, or HEM when available for general
use).
Smart Energy Systems
8.13 In order to maximise energy self-sufficiency of a site, in relation to policy element A6,
a number of methods may be considered. These may include smart local grids,
energy sharing, energy storage and demand -side response, and/or solutions that
combine elements of the above.
The Non-Mandatory Energy Targets in Policy A 1.2
8.14 The achievement of the energy efficiency performance levels set out in Policy A1.2
will reduce the amount of solar PV required under A3 for an on-site net zero balance.
This can save the applicant costs in renewable energy provision and/or energy
offsetting.
8.15 Performance against these non-mandatory targets would need to be calculated using
a method that accurately predicts energy use. SAP is not suitable for this due to its
poor predictive accuracy in the context of high -performance buildings. PHPP
(Passivhaus Planning Package) is a suitable methodology, as it is widely recognised
for its precision in predicting energy performance, particularly for low -energy
buildings. Unlike SAP, PHPP has a proven track record of providing accurate energy
use and heating deman d predictions, ensuring that the development can meet its
energy efficiency targets and reduce operational energy consumption effectively.
8.16 The council may subsequently take a view on whether the incoming Home Energy
Model (HEM) may be suitable, when HEM’s final form is known.
No Fossil Fuels
8.17 The A2 No fossil fuels policy prohibits the use of fossil fuels within the operational
phase of the development, specifically for energy purposes within the buildings,
including heating, hot water, and electricity. The intent is to ensure that the
development aligns with sustainability goals and supporting the transition to low -
carbon energy sources. The restriction on fossil fuels does not apply to their use in
construction activities or transport. The use of fossil fuels may be considered
acceptable in exceptional circumstances, and will be considered on the merits of an
individual case.
Steps to Calculating and Narrating Amount of Renewable Energy Provisions
8.18 Policy A3 should contain the following steps, to be expressed in an energy statement:
• First calculate the total predicted annual energy use in kWh for all proposed
new buildings
• This can be modelled using SAP, BREDEM or PHPP. PHPP is the preferred
model due to its accuracy, to avoid SAP’s inaccuracies at predicting actual
energy use in operation. The council may later take a view on whether the
incoming Home Energy Model (HEM) is a suitable method for energy use
prediction when the final form of HEM is available
• Then calculate the annual renewable energy generation for whole site in
accordance with the MCS guidance for the relevant renewable energy
technology. This does not have to be exclusively on the buildings themselves
and can include provision of new standal one renewable energy installations
within the site. The figure does not include renewable heat delivered by heat
pumps, as that would count instead towards Policy A1
• Deduct the annual renewable generation from the annual energy use. The
result should be zero or less
• If the result is not zero or less, explore how to provide more on-site renewable
energy
• If it proves unfeasible to increase renewable energy generation on -site to
result in an annual balance of energy generation with energy use, then divide
the total annual renewable energy generation by the building footprint. If this
is impossible, provide evidence as to why this is not possible even with a PV
area equivalent to 70% of projected building footprint and reasonably efficient
panels available on the market
• Calculate the residual energy demand (whole building, not per m2) for all
proposed new buildings are all measures proposed towards policies A1 and
A3, then proceed to use this figure to calculate the required amount of
offsetting provision in policy A4
8.19 If a development cannot generate enough renewable energy on -site to balance the
total regulated and unregulated energy use (as calculated after fabric efficiency
improvements in Policy A1.1), the policy requires the renewable energy generation
to meet a minimum of 120 kWh per square metre of projected building footprint per
year.
8.20 Applicants should demonstrate compliance with this fallback target by providing a
clear calculation of the renewable energy generated per square metre of the
projected building footprint. This can be demonstrated in the Energy Statement by:
• Renewable energy system design, such as PV layouts, system capacities,
and expected energy outputs.
• Calculation of the renewable energy generated based on these designs,
ensuring it meets or exceeds the 120 kWh/m2 threshold for the total
projected building footprint.
8.21 If the 120 kWh/m 2 target cannot be met, the applicant must provide evidence
explaining why, even with renewable energy provision up to the equivalent of 70% of
the projected building footprint (including roof overhangs), it is unfeasible to meet this
threshold. This should include details on the constraints (e.g., site limitations,
technical or financial barriers).
If Applicants Cannot Meet Policies A1.1 and A3
8.22 If the requirements of Policy A1.1 (fabric efficiency) and Policy A3 (on-site renewable
energy) cannot be met, applicants must demonstrate compliance through the energy
hierarchy:
• Fabric efficiency: The first step is reducing energy demand through fabric
efficiency measures (e.g., insulation, airtightness, efficient windows). If these
measures can’t be met due to technical or site-specific constraints, applicants
should provide clea r evidence (e.g., feasibility studies or cost analyses) to
justify why
• Renewable energy: After addressing fabric efficiency, applicants must meet
energy needs through on-site renewable energy generation. If fabric efficiency
measures cannot be fully met, applicants can look to increase renewable
energy provision, but they must still comply with overarching policy objectives.
• Submission requirements: Applicants should submit an energy statement that
includes:
- Predicted energy demand (kWh/year);
- Proposed renewable energy contributions (e.g., PV output in kWh/year);
- The percentage of energy demand met by on-site renewables;
- Evidence of site-specific constraints preventing full compliance.
The Offsetting Calculation
8.23 The offset is a one-off payment, calculated by multiplying the annual shortfall in on -
site renewable energy generation (in kWh) by the energy offset price (£/kWh). This
represents the upfront cost of installing the equivalent renewable energy capacity that
the developer has not provided on-site. Since it’s a one-time contribution to cover this
capital cost, it only reflects one year’s shortfall – there’s no need to factor in the
building’s lifetime or ongoing energy use.
8.24 The offset price is based on the national cost of solar PV deployment as published
by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ). This price reflects the
average cost of delivering solar PV (including installation), adjusted to include
inflation and a 10% uplift to support fund administration and delivery of offset projects.
The most up-to-date offset price and details on how it is calculated will be provided
within separate guidance. The council may revise the offset price annually to reflect
updated DESNZ cost data and factor wider environmental requirements into the
delivery model as necessary
8.25 Flexibility in applying the offsetting requirement may be considered where it is
robustly demonstrated that full offsetting would make social or affordable housing
unviable due to site -specific costs that exceed assumptions in the Whole Plan
Viability Assessment. In these cases, the council may consider:
• Reducing the scope of energy to be offset, or
• Applying a discounted offset price where the council is confident it can still
deliver the equivalent renewable generation on a case-by-case basis.
Assured Performance Methods
8.26 These are processes to follow throughout design, construction, commissioning and
building handover that reduce the energy performance gap (the gap between
predicted energy use and actual energy use). These not only help keep the building’s
actual carbon emissions to a minimum (as opposed to their predicted emissions using
inaccurate methods like SAP), but they also help to ensure occupant satisfaction.
Suitable methods include (BSRIA Soft Landings, NEF/GHA Assured Performance
Process, and Passivhaus certifi cation. Alternative processes proposed by the
applicant will be subject to consideration by the council about their evidence -based
merits.
Applicability to Outline Applications
8.27 Compliance with the policies will be conditioned at outline stage and must be
confirmed in detailed reserved matters. However, the council accepts that the degree
of detail provided in the outline energy strategy will be less than for full and reserved
matters applications. It is also recognised that this means the outline energy
calculations may be largely based on assumptions. The aim should be to
demonstrate that options have been identified by which the development could
comply with the policy targets, taking into account the broad mix of anticipated
floorspace, typologies and site conditions. Statements made about estimated carbon
and energy performance based on a high degree of assumptions at outline stage
should be reassessed at detailed reserved matters, albeit the reserved matters may
diverge in how the required compliant performance will be achieved.
8.28 Where more detail is known, it should be reflected in the outline application; for
example, if expecting to connect to a site -specific low-carbon energy source. For a
further example, if expecting a limited number of repeated home types, then the
energy modelling would ideally reflect similar archetypes and identify a specification
by which they could meet the policy targets for energy efficiency and renewable
energy (taking into account site conditions). The modelled homes could reflect, for
example, a sample of a relevant housebuilder’s ‘products’ most likely to be built on
site. This exercise benefits the developer in that it gives an early understanding of
the degree of amendment needed to their existing regular specifications, allowing
them to set up supply chains and economies of scale well in advance of commencing
on site, as outline proposals typically are large -scale and take several years from
outline application, to detailed design, to commencement.
8.29 Outline applications’ estimated offsetting contribution should be stated in the outline
Energy Assessment. These will be subject to a Section 106 agreement, but not paid
at the time of the outline application. In that case the offset contribution must be
recalculated within the subsequent reserved matters application, and paid on or prior
to commencement of works on site for the reserved matters scheme. The reason for
payment into the offset fund prior to commencement of works is so that the offset
fund ad ministrators are able to deliver the offset projects on a timescale not too
dissimilar from the timescale for completion and occupation of the development. The
aim is to enable, wherever possible, the offsetting project to be producing renewable
energy no later than the development’s occupants begin to place their demands on
the grid.
Net Zero Operational Carbon in New Build Non-Residential Development
8.30 As per Policy XA (residential), planning