The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This policy promotes cutting carbon in existing buildings, which produce a third of the district's emissions. Development must take a retrofit-first approach, considering upgrades to an existing building before demolition, following a hierarchy of fabric improvements, then low carbon heating and renewables, then connection to a heat network. Substantial or total demolition needs a feasibility assessment showing a new building would have similar or lower whole-life carbon, deliver public benefits retrofit could not, or that retrofit is not feasible. Sensitive energy efficiency retrofits of heritage buildings are supported where their significance is preserved.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
CNZ2E - Reducing Carbon Emissions in Existing Buildings
1) Development which would result in considerable improvements to the
energy efficiency, carbon emissions and the general suitability and
longevity of an existing building will generally be supported, with
significant weight attributed to those benefits.
E1 - Prioritise Retrofit- First Principles
2) Development should adopt a retrofit-first approach, where options for
retrofitting and retention of existing buildings are considered before
demolition.
3) Development involving existing buildings should demonstrate that a whole
building approach and the following hierarchy has been considered:
a) Refurbishment and upgrading of existing building fabric including
wall, roof and floor insulation, windows, doors and thermal bridging
b) Installation of low or zero-carbon heating and hot water systems,
and the installation of renewable energy generation on-site
c) Connection to an existing or planned low carbon heat network
4) Where substantial or total demolition is proposed, a feasibility assessment
must be submitted. The feasibility assessment should demonstrate:
a) The whole life carbon of a new building(s) would be less or similar
to a suitably comparable retrofit option (as detailed in 3 a-c
above); or
b) The proposed development would deliver public benefits which
would not be delivered by a suitably comparable retrofit option; or
c) The feasible reasons retrofit cannot be considered, including
operational or structural requirements
5) Demolition of existing buildings will only be permitted where applicants
can demonstrate that alternative development options have been
comprehensively explored and following assessment by the Local
Planning Authority, on balance, the whole life carbon of a new building(s)
would be less or similar to a suitably comparable retrofit option, the
proposed demolition of an existing building(s) secures benefits over and
above retention, refurbishing and retrofitting an existing building(s) or is
not feasible as set out in the feasibility assessment.
E2 - Embodied Carbon
6) For major developments involving substantial or total demolition of an
existing building(s), applicants should submit a Whole Life Carbon
Assessment in accordance with Policy D1.
E3 - Adapting Heritage Assets to Climate Change
7) Development which would result in considerable improvements to the
energy efficiency, carbon emissions, resilience and longevity of
designated (including within Conservation Areas) or non-designated
heritage assets will be supported, providing that the significance of the
asset is preserved.
8) A whole-building approach should guide interventions to upgrade historic
buildings, and direct interventions, where they limit the impact to the
significance of the historic buildings or their setting.
9) The sensitive retrofitting of energy efficiency measures and the
appropriate use of micro-renewables in designated and non-designated
heritage assets will be encouraged, providing that the significance,
character and appearance of the asset is preserved in a manner
appropriate for their significance.
Reasoned Justification:
8.69 The Climate Change Committee (an independent, statutory body in the UK that
advises the government on climate change targets and progress in reducing
emissions) has shown that in order for the UK to meet its legally binding carbon
reduction goals, it is vi tal that the existing building stock must be decarbonised .
Therefore, Local Plan policy which supports improving the efficiency of existing
buildings, reducing the energy demand and carbon emissions of existing buildings
aligns with local and national car bon targets (including the UK’s legally mandated
Carbon Budget).
8.70 The NPPF sets out that local planning authorities should give significant weight to the
need to support energy efficiency and low carbon heating improvements to existing
buildings, both domestic and non -domestic. It further sets out that where the
proposals would affect conservation areas, listed buildings or other relevant
designated heritage assets, local planning authorities should also apply the policies
set out in the chapter of the framework relevant to conserving and enhancing the
historic environment.
8.71 The hierarchical approach to retrofitting prioritises fabric upgrades and energy
efficiency improvements before incorporating low- or zero-carbon heating, hot water
systems, and renewable energy generation, aligns with Policy XA, offering potential
benefits including reduced energy bills and longevity of buildings. This policy also
closely correlates to Policy XD with regards to reducing embodied carbon and
promoting circular economy principles.
8.72 This policy aims to ensure that retrofitting of historic buildings and heritage assets are
undertaken in a sensitive manner, balancing the important notions of conserving and
enhancing the historic environment and decarbonising existing buildings, leading to
a more sustainable and resilient historic built environment.
8.73 Compliance with E1 should be demonstrated within the energy statement. It is
accepted that the level of detail provided may be lower for householder and minor
applications. However, where substantial or total demolition is proposed, applicants
would still be expected to assess the embodied carbon of alternatives to demonstrate
why this level of demolition would be acceptable. It is recommended that applicants
engage with the council early in the development process regarding feasibility
assessments and alte rnative options. Additionally, with regards to applicants
demonstrating that a whole building approach are recommended to utilise a nationally
recommended recognised assurance scheme such as BSI PAS 2035. The demolition
(to enable replacement infrastructur e), or upgrades of essential infrastructure such
as water and wastewater works would generally not be obligated to fulfil the
requirements of E1 as it’s acknowledged that replacement and upgrades to essential
infrastructure is often driven by compliance, safety, or resilience needs.
8.74 If applicable, output reports for E2 should be submitted alongside an energy
statement.
8.75 To support applicants in retrofitting existing buildings, various guidance is available
including: LETI Climate Emergency Retrofit Guide (LETI, 2021) , Net Zero Carbon
Toolkit (Etude, Elementa, Passivhaus, Levitt Bernstein, 2021) , and Passivhaus
Trust’s Retrofit Primer (2022).
8.76 In re