The human version (we wrote this, not the council)
This section sets out the spatial strategy in full. Growth is focused on edge-of-settlement sites next to the larger settlements, which the council judges the most sustainable and least harmful option after assessing all reasonable alternatives. A settlement hierarchy directs most growth to the principal town, small towns and large villages, while washed-over Green Belt villages take only 1 to 2% of housing growth. The plan requires significantly higher housing densities, especially near town centres and public transport, to reduce land take, and limits Green Belt release to what is needed with compensatory environmental improvements.
An unofficial plain English summary. The official wording below is
what counts at examination; check it before you rely on anything here.
What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
Spatial Strategy
4.1 The spatial strategy directs growth to the most sustainable locations across the
district, balancing the need to meet objectively assessed housing needs with the
requirement to protect the Green Belt and the character of smaller settlements.
Development will be focused on the edges of the district’s larger settlements, where
access to services, employment, public transport and infrastructure is strongest, and
where development can be planned comprehensively and delivered at scale.
4.2 The strategy recognises that, despite a strong commitment to brownfield
development, such sites can only accommodate a limited proportion (fewer than 700
new homes) of the district’s housing requirement. As a result, the Local Plan makes
provision for circa 4,200 dwellings across the plan period within the Green Belt.
4.3 The council considers that exceptional circumstances exist to justify alterations to
Green Belt boundaries through this Local Plan, as required by national policy. These
exceptional circumstances arise from the cumulative impact of the following factors,
taken together:
• The scale of the district’s objectively assessed housing need, which
cannot be met within existing urban areas or on non-Green Belt land
alone;
• The limited availability and capacity of brownfield land within the urban
area, which, despite being prioritised, can only deliver a small proportion
of the required housing supply;
• The inability to meet the council’s acute needs for affordable housing and
specialist accommodation within the urban area alone;
• The extensive coverage of the district by Green Belt, which significantly
constrains alternative spatial options;
• The need to deliver development in locations that can support strategic
infrastructure provision, climate change mitigation and sustainable travel
patterns.
4.4 The council has undertaken a comprehensive assessment of all reasonable spatial
options and concluded that strategic, edge-of-settlement Green Belt release adjacent
to the larger settlements represents the most sustainable and least harmful approach.
4.5 A clear settlement hierarchy underpins the spatial strategy:
• The Principal Town, small towns (and large suburban settlements) and
large villages (and suburban settlements) will accommodate the majority
of housing and employment growth, reflecting their higher levels of
accessibility, services and infrastructure capacity.
• Washed-over Green Belt villages will play a limited and proportionate role,
together accommodating only 1–2% of the district’s total housing growth.
Development in these villages will be restricted to small-scale schemes
that meet local needs and do not undermine Green Belt openness or
village character.
4.6 This distribution ensures growth is directed away from the least sustainable locations
and avoids incremental, unplanned erosion of the Green Belt.
4.7 Given the constraints on development within existing urban areas, the plan prioritises
strategic edge -of-settlement locations adjoining the larger settlements. These
locations are considered the most appropriate areas for Green Belt release as they:
• Relate well to existing urban form and can be integrated with existing
communities;
• Offer opportunities for comprehensive masterplanning, including new
infrastructure, green spaces and community facilities;
• Enable the creation of sustainable neighbourhoods rather than piecemeal
development; and
• Minimise harm to the purposes of the Green Belt by avoiding isolated or
fragmented development.
4.8 Green Belt releases will be limited to those sites necessary to meet identified
development needs and will be accompanied by compensatory improvements to
environmental quality and accessibility where appropriate.
4.9 To maximise the efficient use of land, particularly within the Green Belt, the Plan
requires significantly increased housing densities on new development sites,
especially those in accessible locations close to town centres, public transport
corridors and key services. Higher-density development will:
• Reduce overall land take;
• Support viable public transport and local services;
• Help deliver a broader mix of housing types and tenures; and
• Ensure that Green Belt land is used responsibly and only where
necessary.
4.10 Design quality will be paramount, with higher densities delivered through well -
designed, place-led schemes that respond positively to local character.
4.11 The council has prioritised brownfield development within the urban area, including
previously developed land and underused sites. While such sites make an important
contribution to housing delivery and urban regeneration, they are insufficient in scale
and num ber to meet the district’s full housing need. Brownfield development will
therefore be pursued alongside, rather t