What the plan says
The text below is extracted automatically from the official PDF and may
contain artefacts; the PDF is authoritative.
CHORLEYWOOD
H18 – Heath House, Rickmansworth Road
H18 – Heath House, Rickmansworth Road, Chorleywood
SHELAA Reference:
ACFS1
Size: 0.2ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 5
Phasing: 0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
The site is considered to be grey belt. Given its brownfield nature and grey belt categorisation, the site
has been retained in the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 5
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The existing access via Rickmansworth Road should be utilised although improvement works
such as widening may be necessary
Design
• The replacement building (serving flats) should be designed to reflect a detached dwelling to suit
the character of the area
Historic Environment
• There are a number of Listed Buildings and heritage assets in the vicinity. This includes a Grade
II Listed Telephone Kiosk at Rickmansworth Road abutting the northeastern boundary, a Grade
II Listed Building, Christ Church to the west of the site and a Grade II Listed Building, The Court,
to the east of the site . The site is also situated within the Chorleywood Common Conservation
Area. A Heritage Impact Assessment/Heritage Statement would be required at the planning
application (and preferably pre-application) stage to identify the impacts on the heritage assets
and appropriate mitigation measures. Early engagement with the council’s conservation officer is
also strongly encouraged
• HCC Historic Environment advised that the site includes/has potential to include heritage assets
of archaeological interest. Any development proposals on the site should be accompanied by a
pre-application or pre-determination archaeological assessment
Flooding
• There is low-medium risk of surface water flooding within the northern portion of the site and along
the northern and eastern boundaries. Future development would be subject to appropriate
mitigation measures to address the risk of surface water flooding
• The council’s Level 2 SFRA (2026) has concluded that arrangements for safe access and escape
will need to be provided for the 1% AEP surface water events with an appropriate allowance for
climate change, considering depth, velocity, and hazard. Design and access arrangements will
need to incorporate measures, so development and occupants are safe. This information will need
to be submitted at the planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage
Green Infrastructure, Biodiversity and TPOs
• The eastern, southern and western boundaries of the site are surrounded by area TPOs (TPO932
and TPO005). Additionally, given its location within the Chorleywood Common Conservation
Area, mature trees within the site are also protected. As such, an Arboricultural Impact
Assessment would be required at the planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage
Mineral and Waste
• HCC Minerals and Waste stated that consideration must be given to the use of material on site
through opportunistic extraction, in order to reduce the need for material to be imported
H20 – Land at Chorleywood Station
H20 – Land at Chorleywood Station
SHELAA Reference:
CFS16
Size: 2.3ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 81
Phasing: 0 - 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt
N/A (Not in Green Belt)
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 81
• A 3 metre development buffer area (except vehicular access) from the railway is required
• The existing level of parking serving the station should be retained unless a proposal is
accompanied by a parking survey and associated report providing robust evidence justifying
any reduction in the level of station parking.
• Due to the nature of the site and proximity to open space, on-site provision of open space/ play
space will not be required, however, a financial contribution to improve nearby open space/
play space may be required
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The site is accessible via an access road off Chorleywood Bottom, which is a single track road
with passing places. Improvement works to this access road (such as widening) may be limited
due to the protected status of the Common surrounding the access road. Early engagement with
HCC Highways (including a Highways pre -application) is strongly encouraged. The submission
of a Transport Assessment should be submitted at the planning application (and preferably pre-
application) stage
• The existing level of parking serving the station should be retained unless a proposal is
accompanied by a parking survey and associated report robustly justifying any reduction in the
level of station parking
• Retention of the current pedestrian access through the site would be require d
• National Highways stated that the submission of a transport assessment may be required at
the planning application stage (relating to potential impact on the Strategic Road Network)
Flooding
There is a stretch of medium -high risk of surface water flooding along the western boundary of
the site. The LLFA state that improved drainage of this area is required to prevent such flooding.
A suitable Flood Risk Assessment and drainage strategy would be required a t the planning
application stage. Development would require suitable mitigation to address surface water flood
risk across the site
Historic Environment
• The site is located between two conservation areas (Chorleywood Station Estate to the
southwest and Chorleywood Common to the northeast) The council’s high-level Heritage Impact
Assessment states that development on the site would have a minor adverse impact on the
historic environment and states that the design of any development should take into account the
adjacent conservation areas. A Heritage Impact Assessmen t/ Heritage Statement should be
submitted at the planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage
Green Infrastructure, Biodiversity and TPOs
• There is a n area TPO covering all trees along the southern boundary of the Site (TPO054).
Future development will need to take account on the TPO along the southern boundary. An
Arboricultural I mpact Assessment will be required at the planning application (and preferably
pre-application) stage
• The eastern boundary is adjacent to Chorleywood Common Local Wildlife site and the site is in
close proximity to the Chorleywood Common . HCC Ecology stated that the site has high
ecological sensitivity due to the presence of the Chorleywood Common Local Nature Reserve
and Local Wildlife Site. As such a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (or similar) should be
submitted at the planning application (and prefarably pre-application) stage
Environmental Health and Pollution
• Potential noise and vibrations caused by the use of the station/railway line would need to be
addressed through mitigation measures. Relevant assessments and reports (such as Noise
Assessments) would be required at a planning application (and preferably pre-application) stage
Mineral and Waste
• HCC Mineral and Waste stated that consideration must be given to the use of material on site
through opportunistic extraction, in order to reduce the need for material to be imported
• A Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) will be required to support any proposal at the planning
application stage
Utilities and Infrastructure
• Thames Water have advised that the scale of future development/s is likely to require upgrades
to the wastewater network. The Developer (in conjunction with the Local Planning Authority)
should liaise with Thames Water at the earliest opportunity to agree a housing and infrastructure
phasing plan in the site. The plan should determine the magnitude of spare capacity currently
available within the network and what phasing may be required to ensure development does not
outpace delivery of essential network upgrades to accommodate future development
• The HWE Integrated Care Board is likely to seek a financial contribution towards medical
infrastructure in Chorleywood
H21 – Hill Farm, Stag Lane
H21 – Hill Farm, Stag Lane, Chorleywood
SHELAA Reference:
CFS18a
Size: 8.7ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 40
Phasing:
0 - 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Greenfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
The site is considered to be grey belt. During the Local Plan process the Green Belt boundaries were
altered, and the site was entirely removed from the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 40
• Provision of play space / open space
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The site would be accessed from Stag Lane, which is a narrow road with capacity for single -file
traffic for most of its length. Further highway improvement work would likely be
required. Engagement with HCC Highways (including a Highways pre-application) at the earliest
stage is strongly recommended
• A Transport Assessment would likely be required at the planning application (and preferably pre-
application) stage
• There are Public Rights of Way running through the centre of the site, which need to be
considered during the earliest stages of the design process
Historic Environment
• Heronsgate Conservation Area is located to the south of the site (to the south of Long Lane) . A
planning application (and preferably pre -application) should be supported by a Heritage Impact
Assessment/Heritage Statement
• HCC Historic Environment advised that the site includes/has potential to include heritage assets
of archaeological interest. Any development proposals on the site should be accompanied by a
pre-determination archaeological assessment
Flooding
• Mitigation measures to address surface water flooding within the site would be required
Green Infrastructure, Biodiversity and TPOs
• HCC Ecology state that the site has high ecological sensitivity due to the Shepherd’s Lane Wood
Local Wildlife Site which abuts the south -eastern boundary. There should be a development
buffer from this Local Wildlife Site . At the planning application (and preferably pre -application)
stage an Ecological Appraisal/ Ecological Impact Assessment would be required
• The site provides a key connection between the Wearing’s Field Local Wildlife Site and the wider
countryside. To protect the biodiversity of this Local Wildlife Site, development of the site should
ensure a green corridor between Wearing’s Field and the wider countryside is maintained. Part
of this should include the pond on the site as this is unique on the south-west side of Chorleywood
and is a key ecological feature
H22 – Land off Solesbridge Lane
H22 – Land off Solesbridge Lane, Chorleywood
SHELAA Reference:
CFS72
Size: 0.4ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 14
Phasing: 0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Greenfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt
The site is considered to be grey belt. During the Local Plan process the Green Belt boundaries were
altered, and the site was entirely removed from the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 14
• Access and highway improvements including improved pedestrian infrastructure along
Solesbridge Lane and The Readings
• A minimum 5 metre development buffer will be required from the ordinary watercourse.
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The existing access off Solesbridge Lane would be utilised
• The access and highway improvement s (including increased pedestrian infrastructure and
connections along Solesbrige Lane and The Readings) agreed by HCC Highways during the
Local Plan process must be implemented. Prior to the submission of a planning application , an
access strategy and schedule of works must be agreed with HCC Highways. The details of any
agreed highways proposals should be provided at the planning application (and preferably pre-
application) stage
• A public Right of Way (PROW) runs along the western boundary must be considered
Flooding
• An unnamed ordinary watercourse is located at the eastern boundary of the site. Whilst the
majority of the Site (74% of the Site area) is in Flood Zone 1, a portion of the site to the northeast
(25% of the Site area) fall within Flood Zone 3b. No development will be permitted in Flood Zone
3b and appropriate mitigation measures will need to be implemented to address flood risk issues
from various sources on the site. A minimum 5 metre development buffer will be required from
the ordinary watercourse
.
• The majority of the site is at moderate risk of groundwater flooding except in northeast, which is
considered as very high risk. Appropriate mitigation measures will need to be implemented to
address flood risk issues
Historic Environment
• There is a Grade II Listed Building (Solesbridge House) located in the adjacent plot to the
southwest. Any future design would need to take into account both the position and setting of
the Listed Building. Given the proximity of the Lis ted Building, a Heritage Impact Assessment/
Heritage Statement would be required at the planning application (and ideally pre -application)
stage
Landscape
The site is situated to the edge of Chilterns National Landscape to the immediate north and
northeast and has been identified as having medium sensitivity to built -development. Future
development at the Site would need to be sympathetically designed to mitigate any impact to the
National Landscape . A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment would be required at a
planning application (and ideally pre-application) stage
Environmental Health and Pollution
• Any development of the site would need to take account the presence of potential noise and air
quality issues arising from the site’s close proximity to the M25. Relevant assessments and
reports, including details of mitigation measures may be required at a planning (and ideally
application) stage
H23 – Garages at Copmans Wick
H23 – Garages, Copmans Wick
SHELAA Reference:
CW9
Size: 0.1ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 5
Phasing: 0 - 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
N/A (Not in Green Belt)
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 5
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The existing access via Copman’s Wick should be utilised
• A public Right of Way (PROW) runs parallel to the north of the site, which any future development
must consider
Green Infrastructure, Biodiversity and TPOs
• There are protected trees close to the eastern boundary of the site and future development will
need to take account of these TPOs (including mitigation of buffer distances as appropriate). An
Arboricultural Impact Assessment will be required at the planni ng application stage (and
preferably pre-application stage)
Flooding
• The southern and eastern areas of the site are at risk of surface water flooding from a surface
water flow path originating to the southwest. The eastern portion of the site is at high risk, and
the western portion of the site is at medium and high risk. Mitigation measures will be required
address the risk of surface water flooding across the site
H24 – Chorleywood Library
H24 – Chorleywood Library
SHELAA Reference:
NCFS15
Size: 0.1ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential /
Community (Library)
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 5
Phasing:
0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
N/A (Not in Green Belt)
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 5
• The public library is required to be retained at the ground floor
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The existing access of Lower Road should be utilised
Social and Community
• The public library is required to be retained at the ground floor
Historic Environment
• Chorleywood Station Estate Conservation Area is situated to the northeast of the site. A Heritage
Impact Assessment /Heritage Statement would be required at a planning application (and
preferably pre-application) stage
Flooding
• There is a low to medium surface water flood risk in the north, east and southeast of the site due
to a flow path along Lower Road
• The council’s Level 2 SFRA (2026) has concluded that development should be steered away
from areas of significant surface water flooding and groundwater monitoring is suggested to
determine emergence risk. A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) must be submitted at the planning
application (and preferably pre-application) stage
• Safe access may not be possible during the 1% AEP plus climate change event, which must be
considered during the site-specific FRA. Additionally, as set out by the LLFA, an access & egress
assessment and hazard assessment should be submitted prior to determination
H25 – North Hill Farm
H25 – North Hill Farm, Chorleywood
SHELAA Reference:
NCFS17
Size: 3.24ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 57
Phasing:
0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Mixed
Greem Belt / Grey Belt:
The site is considered to be grey belt. Given that the site is not edge of settlement, its predominantly
brownfield nature and grey belt categorisation, the site has been retained in the Green Belt
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 57
• Development should be limited to the previously developed areas of the site (northern section
of the site), whilst the greenfield areas (central to southern section of the site) should be used
for open space, BNG and similar uses
• Provision of open Space / play Space
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, Highways and Sustainable Transport
• The site can be accessed via the existing access off North Hill , although the access road would
need improvement works to accommodate the proposed scale of development
Historic Environment
• The site is located circa 100m from the Chorleywood Common Conservation Area, located to
the south of the site. The council’s high -level Heritage Impact Assessment considers that
development of the site would have a minor adverse impact on the historic environment
• A Heritage Impact Assessment/Heritage Statement would be required at the planning application
(and preferably pre -application) stage, including details of potential mitigation measures (such
as increased planting) to limit the impact on nearby heritage assets
Flooding
• The site is partially impacted by a 1 in 1000 surface water flood risk designation. Accordingly,
any future proposal at the site is likely to require a supporting Flood Risk Assessment
Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity
• There are protected trees situated to the immediate southeastern, southwestern and northern
boundaries of the site respectively. Although there are no TPO s within the site, future
development will need to take account of the adjacent protected trees. An Arboriculural Impact
Assessment should be submitted at a planning application (and ideally pre-application) stage
• HCC Ecology advised that a Preliminary Roost Assessment and Preliminary Ecological
Appraisal may be required at the planning application stage
Landscape
• The site is located within the Chilterns National Landscape. Accordingly, it will be necessary to
submit a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment at the planning application (and preferably
pre-application) stage
Mineral and Waste
• HCC Mineral and Waste stated that consideration must be given to the use of material on site
through opportunistic extraction, in order to reduce the need for material to be imported
• A Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) may be required to support any proposal at the
planning application stage
H26 – Chorleywood Telephone Exchange, Shire Lane
H26 – Chorleywood Telephone Exchange, Shire Lane
SHELAA Reference:
NSS23
Size: 0.11ha
Proposed use(s):
Residential
Indicative Dwelling
Capacity: 10
Phasing: 0 – 5 years
Greenfield/Brownfield:
Brownfield
Green Belt / Grey Belt:
N/A (Not in Green Belt)
Main Development Requirements:
• Indicative dwelling capacity of 10
Site Constraints and Other Requirements and Considerations:
Access, H