← Open Consultation: all consultations

Buckinghamshire Plan Explorer

Search the Draft Local Plan for Buckinghamshire. 450 pages, made findable.

The consultation closes at 11:59pm, Sunday 6 September 2026.

OpenConsult / Buckinghamshire Plan Explorer

Site allocations

The specific sites the plan proposes to allocate for development, and what each allocation requires.

97 sections of the plan, in document order.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains how the Local Plan is used in decision-making. It forms part of the statutory development plan, so planning applications are decided in line with it unless other important factors point the other way. It sits alongside neighbourhood plans, minerals and waste policies and other Council strategies. Applications are judged against all relevant policies together, not one in isolation, and the Buckinghamshire Design Code and Parking Standards also apply. A Policies Map supports the Plan.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section describes how the Plan is organised. Chapters cover the introduction, the national and strategic context, a spatial portrait of the county, the vision and objectives, the spatial strategy and strategic policies, site allocations, and detailed development management policies. Appendices include the monitoring framework, housing and employment trajectories, the Buckinghamshire Design Code, parking standards and the Policies Map. Together these parts form one framework for shaping growth to 2045.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section covers planning for town centres. Aylesbury and High Wycombe are centres of regional importance, supported by smaller centres across the county. The Plan identifies a need for 59,000 sqm of floorspace for retail, food and drink, and leisure and cultural uses by 2035. The first focus is bringing vacant units back into use; cutting vacancy rates to 10% would provide 14,300 sqm. Longer term, most new floorspace will come through large mixed-use allocations linked to population growth.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets the housing strategy. It provides for 91,287 new homes between 2024 and 2045, with a stepped requirement of 2,150 homes a year to 2029/30 and 5,222 a year from 2030/31. Growth is prioritised on brownfield land, where 107 allocations will provide 7,599 homes, and at 10 new and expanded settlements (NESS sites) including Aylesbury North, Winslow and Cheddington, each planned for up to 3,650 homes. Further greenfield sites are allocated according to a settlement hierarchy, with no allocations in the Green Belt.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy provides for Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation. The identified need over the plan period is 681 pitches and 38 plots, of which 516 pitches and 30 plots are needed in the first 10 years. The Council will allocate 280 pitches and 14 plots towards this, through a mix of new sites and the intensification or expansion of existing sites, with further pitches on NESS sites in later years. Existing lawful sites are safeguarded, and delivery will be monitored with more sites identified if needed.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets the strategy for economic growth. The Plan must allocate at least 219 hectares of employment land to 2045, and after committed sites are counted, about 147 hectares of additional land is allocated. Major locations include expansion at Westcott Venture Park and new employment land at the Winslow, Buckingham and Turweston new settlements, plus town centre sites in Aylesbury and High Wycombe. Research and development floorspace is strongly supported, and no new employment development is allowed in the highest flood risk zone (Flood Zone 3b).

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the site allocations chapter. Allocations identify specific parcels of land to deliver the plan's strategy, giving certainty about where development will happen and what it will include, and helping maintain a five-year supply of housing land. Concept plans alongside the NESS site policies illustrate key principles for each site. The NESS numbering reflects an original assessment of 18 potential sites, later reduced to 10, with original reference numbers kept for consistency.

Policy NESS004

Cheddington

pp. 116–121

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation sets out a 342.1-hectare site next to Cheddington, near Leighton Buzzard, for a minimum of 5,090 homes, with 3,650 expected in the plan period, plus 12 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and 3,500 sqm of town centre uses. Requirements include three primary schools, a secondary school, the Horton Bypass and a new railway bridge at Station Road. Development must protect the setting of Mentmore Towers and the Grand Union Canal, reuse the former railway line as a green corridor, and follow a site-wide masterplan.

Policy NESS005

Haddenham

pp. 122–127

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers a 293.6-hectare site adjoining Haddenham for a minimum of 6,610 homes, with around 3,545 in the plan period, plus 7 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and 3,500 sqm of town centre uses. It requires three primary schools, a secondary school, improved access to Haddenham and Thame Parkway station and better bus services. Development must integrate Snakemoor Nature Reserve, protect Haddenham Conservation Area, and manage odour and other impacts from the nearby wastewater treatment works. A site-wide masterplan is required.

Policy NESS008

Buckingham

pp. 128–133

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation sets out a 217.5-hectare site south-west of Buckingham for a minimum of 4,700 homes, with around 2,235 in the plan period, plus 10 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, about 1.7 hectares of employment land and around 2,000 sqm of town centre uses. It requires three primary schools, a secondary school and the Buckingham South Spine Road linking the A413 to the A421. Development must protect the setting of Gawcott Conservation Area with a green buffer, manage flood risk around the River Great Ouse and Padbury Brook, and follow a site-wide masterplan.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers a 177.2-hectare urban extension to Princes Risborough delivering up to 2,895 homes within the plan period, plus 11 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and a local centre with 300 to 400 sqm of shops and around 500 sqm of business space. A central requirement is the Princes Risborough Relief Road, a complete new alternative route to the A4010. The site must also provide two primary schools, contributions to secondary education, a green corridor along the Crowbrook, and keep a gap between the town and Longwick.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation sets out a 103.2-hectare site south of Stoke Mandeville for a minimum of 1,650 homes within the plan period, plus around 1,500 sqm of town centre uses. Higher densities are focused near the railway station, which will be enhanced as a transport hub with a new pedestrian and cycle crossing of the railway. Requirements include a primary school, the South Spine Road, buffers along the HS2 corridor, protection of the setting of Stoke House, and a site-wide masterplan and phasing strategy.

Policy NESS012

Winslow

pp. 149–157

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers a 411.4-hectare site around Winslow for a minimum of 9,370 homes, with 3,650 in the plan period, plus 15 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, around 16 hectares of employment land and 3,500 sqm of town centre uses. It requires four primary schools, two secondary schools, new link roads and integration with East West Rail, whose safeguarded land must not be built on. Green gaps must prevent merging with Great Horwood. The employment land targets high-value sectors, helped by the new station and the Oxford to Cambridge growth corridor.

Policy NESS013

Turweston

pp. 158–164

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation sets out a 143-hectare site east of Brackley, next to the county boundary, for around 2,890 homes, plus 5 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, about 2 hectares of employment land and 2,500 sqm of town centre uses. It requires two primary schools, contributions to secondary education, improvements to the A422 corridor and buffers to HS2, Ancient Woodland and the sewage treatment works. Development must conserve the setting of Turweston Conservation Area and manage flood risk from the River Great Ouse.

Policy NESS015

Beachampton

pp. 165–170

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation creates a new settlement on a 381.6-hectare site in north Buckinghamshire, next to the Milton Keynes boundary. It will deliver a minimum of 8,230 homes, with around 3,200 in the plan period to 2045 and the rest beyond, plus 15 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and around 2,500 sqm of town centre uses. Requirements include four primary schools, two secondary schools, the Whaddon Bypass and a spine road network. Green gaps must keep Beachampton, Nash and Whaddon separate, and Ancient Woodland must be protected with buffers.

Policy NESS018

Wing

pp. 171–176

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers a 96-hectare site north-west of Wing for a minimum of 1,630 homes, all expected within the plan period, plus 5 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and around 1,000 sqm of town centre uses. It requires a primary school, contributions to off-site education and GP services, and new roads including the Wing North Spine Road and Wing West Link Road. Development must protect Wing Conservation Area and the Castle Hill Scheduled Monument, provide buffers to Local Wildlife Sites, and follow a site-wide masterplan.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the individual policies for housing allocations of more than 200 homes, including mixed use sites. It explains that sites have been allocated in line with the settlement hierarchy and are grouped by the tier in which each settlement sits in the Settlement Review. The text here is a short fragment that leads into the tier listings that follow.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the settlement tier system used to group site allocations. The Settlement Review places every settlement in Buckinghamshire into tiers based on local services, public transport, jobs and distance to the nearest town, to judge how much growth is sustainable. Tier 1 covers the major urban areas: Aylesbury, High Wycombe and land on the edge of Milton Keynes, while Tier 5 covers medium and small villages and Tier 6 hamlets, where nothing is allocated. Sites of 200 or more homes get their own policy; smaller allocations sit in appendix K.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers around 92.8 hectares at South Aylesbury for approximately 1,350 homes and 5 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, made up of five land parcels planned together. It requires a 2FE primary school, a local centre, a community building with a possible police touchdown facility, and 50% green infrastructure. Land is safeguarded for the Aylesbury Southeast Link Road, now under construction, with financial contributions towards it. Detailed flood modelling is required, including measures to help protect Stoke Mandeville Hospital from surface water flooding.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers a 113-hectare site at south-west Aylesbury for 1,400 homes and 5 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, with a 2FE primary school, on-site health and community facilities, a linear park and sports pitches. It requires a Southwest Link Road connecting the Stoke Mandeville relief road to the A418 Oxford Road, plus strategic flood defences and drainage. Outline permission was granted in May 2026, with construction expected from 2028, delivering fifty homes initially then 140 per year. A buffer is needed against noise from HS2.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers three parcels totalling around 242.6 hectares north of the A41 at Aylesbury, including Aylesbury Woodlands. It provides approximately 1,700 homes plus sixty extra care units, around 102,800 sqm of employment floorspace including the Aylesbury Woodlands Enterprise Zone, a 4,000 sqm local centre, a two-form entry primary school, a 6,000 sqm hotel and conference facility and a 16-hectare sports village. Primary access must come from the Eastern Link Road, at least 50% of the site must be green infrastructure, and employment land is safeguarded from other uses.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers around 225.5 hectares south of the A41 at Aylesbury, mainly Hampden Fields, for approximately 3,000 homes plus a sixty-bed care home or extra care facility. It includes about 6.90 hectares of employment land, two primary schools with pre-schools, a local centre, a health facility and 108.34 hectares of green infrastructure. A dualled Southern Link Road between the A413 and A41 is required, along with town-wide flood defences. Outline permission has been granted and work has started, with careful phasing needed across the merged sites.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation describes Kingsbrook, a 306.6-hectare urban extension east of Aylesbury delivering 2,460 homes, 10 hectares of employment land, two primary schools, land for a secondary school, a neighbourhood centre and a major wetland park. Outline permission was granted in 2013 and the site is built as three villages. As of March 2025, 1,922 homes were complete with 538 remaining, and the Eastern Link Road and Stocklake Link have been finished. The whole development is expected to be complete by 2028.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers around seventy-nine hectares north of Martin Dalby Way on the edge of Aylesbury for an assumed 3,150 homes. It requires a local centre, a 3FE primary school, a community hall, healthcare provision and at least 50% multi-functional green infrastructure, plus a new linear park active travel route. Development must protect the Quarrendon Scheduled Monument immediately to the south, including its grazing regime, and be landscape-led given the site's open, elevated position. Flood modelling of Hardwick Brook and Weedon Ditch is required.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers Friarscroft car park, a multi-storey public car park in west Aylesbury town centre close to the train station, for an assumed 300 homes. Redevelopment must be a well-designed, high-density scheme making good use of this brownfield site, and should explore providing fewer car parking spaces. Proposals must show that the public parking is either underused or can be re-provided, managed or offset elsewhere, and demonstrate improved sustainable travel options. The scheme should complement neighbouring regeneration areas.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers The Gateway, a 20.6-hectare brownfield site in Aylesbury currently occupied by Council offices and surface car parking, a twenty-minute walk from the train station. It is allocated for 4,000 sqm of town centre and office floorspace plus an assumed 1,455 homes, with new public spaces and potentially fewer parking spaces. Development should bring culture and leisure-led uses, landmark buildings designed to soften the impact of height, active ground-floor frontages and better pedestrian links towards the town centre. An early masterplan is required.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers the Exchange Street car park in Aylesbury town centre for a mixed development of 2,000 sqm of town centre uses, 2,000 sqm of offices, around 450 homes, new public realm and 150 parking spaces. The site has been a surface car park since around 2010 and sits next to Hale Leys Shopping Centre and The Exchange leisure quarter. Development must enhance the setting of listed buildings in Market Square and the Aylesbury Conservation Area, keep the mature horse chestnut trees on Exchange Street, and improve pedestrian links across the town centre.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers the Royal Mail delivery office site, just over one hectare next to Aylesbury town centre, for an assumed 80 homes and 420 sqm of town centre retail. New buildings should match neighbouring heights and follow a design brief reflecting the local area. Access would be from a single upgraded junction off Upper Hundreds Way, with a new at-grade pedestrian crossing near the existing subway. Because of past uses, a contamination investigation is required, along with ecological assessments for birds and bats and a noise assessment.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers Hale Leys Shopping Centre, a 0.6-hectare site in the heart of Aylesbury town centre, for a mixed development of 4,821 sqm of employment space, 4,821 sqm of retail and an assumed 220 homes. Ground floors should stay in retail use with apartments above. Development must provide active frontages towards Market Square and the High Street, enhance the setting of nearby listed buildings and the conservation area, and follow a design brief consistent with Aylesbury Garden Town principles. Keeping retail on the site is seen as vital for a vibrant town centre.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers Gomm Valley and Ashwells in High Wycombe for an assumed 646 homes, 1.2 hectares of employment land and a one-form entry primary school. Development must be landscape-led and keep an undeveloped gap of at least 200 metres between High Wycombe and Tylers Green. The valley contains sensitive wildlife sites, including Gomm Valley SSSI, ancient woodland and chalk grassland, so buffers and a significant biodiversity net gain are required. A traffic-calmed spine road linking Cock Lane and Gomm Road is needed, and parts of the site already have planning permission.

← Back to the plan search

Have your say

  1. Submit a formal representation. This is the only response that must be considered at the plan’s independent examination. Open the official response portal
  2. Email your ward councillors. They voted on this plan and represent you. The draft raises the consultation window and the missing costs.
    Not sure of your ward? Find your councillor →
  3. Email the planning policy team with questions about the consultation. Email the policy team

Deadline: 11:59pm, Sunday 6 September 2026. Emails open in your own mail app with a suggested draft. Edit it so it says what you think.