Infrastructure & utilities

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the water infrastructure policies. Water is described as a vital resource supporting people, habitats and ecosystems, and managing it properly, especially given climate change, is central to creating sustainable places. The policies that follow aim to reduce flood risk and steer development to appropriate locations, require measures for efficient water use, and ensure developments are accompanied by the necessary water infrastructure.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy directs development to areas of lowest flood risk and requires that it does not increase flood risk elsewhere, allowing for climate change over the development's lifetime. Proposals must take a sequential approach to choosing and laying out sites, considering flooding from rivers, surface water, groundwater and sewers, informed by the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Flood management must be built in from the earliest design stages, and a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment is required, with hydraulic modelling where existing flood information is inadequate.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section gives the full flood risk policy and its reasoning. On sites at risk, buildings must sit in the safest areas, safe access must be shown, and floor levels must be at least 600mm above the 1% annual probability flood level plus climate change allowance. All development needs a drainage strategy, an undeveloped buffer of at least 8 metres along watercourses, and space for water through green and blue infrastructure. South Warwickshire has a history of flooding from multiple sources, and climate change is expected to make floods more frequent and severe.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out water efficiency rules for new development. South Warwickshire is classed as an area of serious water stress, so new homes must be designed to use no more than 100 litres of water per person per day. Homes with gardens must have a water butt of at least 200 litres. Non-residential buildings over 1,000 square metres must meet the BREEAM Excellent water standard and assess options for reusing rainwater or greywater. Extensions, changes of use and farm irrigation reservoirs are also covered.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers a 96-hectare site north-west of Wing for a minimum of 1,630 homes, all expected within the plan period, plus 5 Gypsy and Traveller pitches and around 1,000 sqm of town centre uses. It requires a primary school, contributions to off-site education and GP services, and new roads including the Wing North Spine Road and Wing West Link Road. Development must protect Wing Conservation Area and the Castle Hill Scheduled Monument, provide buffers to Local Wildlife Sites, and follow a site-wide masterplan.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires developers to show that enough water supply and sewerage capacity exists, or will be provided, before new development is occupied. Applicants must consult the water company, keep surface water and foul drainage separate, and avoid harming water quality in rivers or groundwater. Major schemes need an Outline Foul Drainage Strategy showing connections, upgrades and phasing. Development near sewage works must assess odour, noise and similar impacts. New or upgraded water infrastructure will be supported where its impacts are acceptable.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains how the water and wastewater policy will work in practice. Severn Trent Water is the water and sewerage company for South Warwickshire, and developers are urged to engage with it early because a right to connect does not guarantee that capacity exists. Any needed upgrades will be secured through planning conditions or legal agreements. Connecting surface water to foul sewers is unacceptable unless approved and no other viable option exists. A possible law change would remove the automatic right to connect surface water to public sewers.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the green and blue infrastructure chapter. Green infrastructure means natural, cultivated or designed assets such as trees, woodlands, hedgerows and open spaces. Blue infrastructure means water features such as rivers, streams, wetlands, ponds and canals, and some features, like floodplains, can be both. The policies here support strategic objectives including timely infrastructure, attractive places, better quality of life, connecting people to places and protecting environmental assets.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers around 92.8 hectares at South Aylesbury for approximately 1,350 homes and 5 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, made up of five land parcels planned together. It requires a 2FE primary school, a local centre, a community building with a possible police touchdown facility, and 50% green infrastructure. Land is safeguarded for the Aylesbury Southeast Link Road, now under construction, with financial contributions towards it. Detailed flood modelling is required, including measures to help protect Stoke Mandeville Hospital from surface water flooding.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires development to protect, improve and extend green and blue infrastructure, meaning natural assets such as open spaces, trees, rivers and canals. Schemes must secure management and funding for these features for at least 30 years. Proposals should contribute to strategic opportunities identified in the evidence, such as restoring ancient woodlands, a River Avon Linear Park and better access to the canals. Design must respond to local landscape character, connect habitats, use native and climate-resilient planting and help reduce flood risk.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets further open space requirements and explains how they apply. Developments must provide 0.86 hectares of community growing space, including allotments, per 1,000 households, and 0.5 hectares of play provision for children and teenagers per 1,000 people. Major schemes must submit an open space and play assessment. Off-site provision or payments are only accepted where on-site provision is genuinely not achievable. Student housing, care villages and retirement communities must contribute, and major commercial schemes may also need to provide open space.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets out who will own and look after public open space created by development. Open space will be offered to the town or parish council or the local planning authority, along with a 30-year maintenance payment from the developer. A management and maintenance plan is required, including yearly joint inspections with the council. Handing open space to a private management company is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, after both the council and a residents' association have declined it. Open space must stay publicly accessible permanently.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains how the open space stewardship policy will be enforced. Where a private company manages open space, the council keeps the right to inspect it and require remedial work, backed by planning enforcement if needed. If a residents' association route is used, the space should transfer to it within 5 years of the last home being occupied. The council may decline to adopt open space where costs or practical difficulties are too great. Detailed standards and methods for calculating maintenance sums are set out in Annex C of the plan.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the community and leisure infrastructure policies. It explains that sustainable communities need access to facilities that support daily life and residents' health and wellbeing. The policies that follow protect existing sport, recreation and leisure facilities and secure new ones, protect community facilities such as local shops, halls and pubs, and support the area's arts and culture offer across South Warwickshire.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects sport, recreation and leisure facilities and requires new housing to support them. Facilities can only be lost if an equivalent replacement is provided, they are shown to be surplus, the benefits of the proposal clearly outweigh the loss, or the facility adds no real value to the area. New facilities must meet recognised sporting standards and be reachable by public transport, walking and cycling. Major developments must provide facilities on site or pay towards off-site improvements, calculated using Sport England's tools.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the evidence behind the sport and leisure policy. The Playing Pitch Strategy and Built Facilities Strategy inform decisions on protecting and providing facilities. Sport England's calculators estimate how many pitches and buildings a new development's population would need and the associated costs. Where a scheme is too small to justify a whole new pitch or facility, a contribution towards improving an existing site is recommended instead. The approach follows national planning policy on access to sport for health and wellbeing.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects community facilities that serve local needs. A facility can only be lost if a viability assessment confirms it has no realistic prospect of continuing, it has been actively marketed for at least 12 months at a realistic price for its lawful use, and similar facilities are easily accessible nearby or a comparable replacement is provided. Proposals for new or improved community facilities will be supported where they promote healthy, inclusive and safe communities.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains which buildings count as community facilities and how any loss must be justified. The list includes local convenience stores, community halls, pubs, libraries, places of worship, local health facilities and nurseries, though it is not exhaustive. Applicants seeking to close a facility must supply at least two years of audited accounts, show they explored ways to improve viability, and normally provide five years of maintenance evidence. A marketing statement must set out the asking price, any price changes and all offers received.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy supports the provision, improvement and protection of arts and cultural facilities and creative industries. Proposals must suit the character of the area, avoid harm to residents, public safety and neighbouring uses, and consider access by all forms of transport. Temporary arts uses of vacant sites are supported in principle. Losing an existing arts or cultural facility will be resisted unless it is shown to be unviable, replaced with an improved offer, clearly beneficial to remove, or offset by a contribution to another local venue.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the arts and culture policy. It applies the agent of change principle, meaning whoever introduces new development near an existing venue is responsible for managing its impact on that venue. Arts and cultural facilities include performing and visual arts studios, creative workspaces, museums, theatres, cinemas and music venues. The plan notes that arts and culture are important to the local economy and identity, and supports temporary use of empty buildings for pop-up exhibitions and performances.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the renewable energy policies. Both Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick District Councils have declared climate emergencies. Stratford-on-Avon aims to be carbon neutral as an organisation by 2030 and to cut district-wide emissions by at least 55% by 2030. Warwick District Council has committed to cutting energy use and emissions from its public buildings and council housing. Much of the area's carbon comes from transport, and limited power supply also needs addressing to support economic growth.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects existing large-scale renewable energy infrastructure, including solar farms, wind turbines, battery storage, heat networks, bioenergy plants and green hydrogen production. These assets are safeguarded from development that would harm their operation, safety, maintenance or future adaptability. They can only be lost where they are no longer needed, replaced with equal or greater capacity, or outweighed by overriding public benefits with compensation. Nearby development must show it will not reduce efficiency, for example by overshadowing solar panels or disturbing wind flow to turbines.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section adds further protections for renewable energy infrastructure. Repowering, life extension and co-location of technologies, such as solar with battery storage, are supported where they raise output without unacceptable impacts. Grid connections, substations and cable routes are safeguarded, and maintenance work by network operators is supported in principle. Where infrastructure is no longer viable, a decommissioning and restoration plan is required, prioritising biodiversity, soil recovery and, where appropriate, restoring farmland. Community benefits such as local energy tariffs may also be considered.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires affordable workspace in larger employment schemes. It applies to developments of 1,000 square metres or more of employment floorspace, including major mixed-use schemes. At least 10% of the floorspace must be affordable workspace, let at rents at least 20% below average market rents and secured permanently through planning obligations. It should normally be provided on site; where that is shown to be unfeasible, off-site provision or a payment may be accepted. Exceptions must be justified by a robust viability assessment, with review mechanisms possible.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains why affordable workspace is needed. Over 80% of firms in South Warwickshire are micro-businesses with fewer than 10 employees, and these are most exposed to rising property costs. The South Warwickshire Affordable Business Study (2026) found a constrained supply of quality office and industrial space, affordability pressures for small firms and start-ups, and limited new development because of viability. Viability testing suggested large industrial sites could deliver 10% affordable workspace at 60% of market rents.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains how the town centre policy will be applied. In the main urban centres, at least 50% of units in Primary Shopping Areas should remain in retail use. It sets out the hierarchy of centres, with Leamington Spa and Stratford the most significant, Warwick and Kenilworth serving more local needs, and smaller rural towns such as Alcester and Southam acting as Local Centres. Evidence shows a need for 7.1 hectares of office land, about 57,900 square metres, up to 2050, to be met mainly through conversions rather than new site allocations.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation covers land off Amersham Road, including Tralee Farm, at Hazlemere for an assumed 350 homes. The layout must keep a sense of separation between Hazlemere and Holmer Green, and the existing orchard, woodland at Badger Way and field boundaries should be retained and linked by green space. Access would come from the A404 and Wycombe Road, with walking and cycling routes through the site. The development must also fund the extra primary school places it creates.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This allocation describes Salden Chase, a roughly 145 hectare new community at Newton Longville delivering up to 1,855 homes plus 60 extra care housing units. It includes about 2.07 hectares of employment land, a primary school with pre-school, a secondary school on 5.2 hectares, a neighbourhood centre, a GP surgery and 53.67 hectares of green open space. Road access comes from three points, with walking, cycling and bus links to Bletchley and Milton Keynes. Outline planning permission has already been granted, and part of the land is safeguarded for East West Rail.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the reasoning behind the space and accessibility standards. The population aged 65 and over is projected to rise 53% in Stratford-on-Avon district and 43% in Warwick district between 2025 and 2050, with large increases in people with mobility problems. The evidence therefore recommends all new homes meet the M4(2) adaptable standard, plus 2.5% of market homes and 5% of affordable homes built as wheelchair user dwellings, equal to around 44 extra wheelchair homes a year. Exceptions are possible where site constraints such as flood risk or heritage make compliance impossible, but robust evidence is required.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the detail and justification for the affordable housing requirements. Evidence identifies a need for 1,237 affordable homes a year across South Warwickshire, about 56% of the total housing need of 2,197 homes a year. On schemes of 10 or more homes, affordable housing should normally be built on site, while smaller schemes in rural areas pay a financial contribution instead. Some development types, such as holiday lets, mobile homes and residential annexes, are exempt. Affordable homes will be secured in perpetuity through Section 106 legal agreements, and requirements are subject to viability.