Stratford-upon-Avon

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the South Warwickshire Local Plan, prepared jointly by Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick District Councils to guide where and how new homes, jobs and infrastructure are built up to 2050. It describes an area of 488 square miles, mostly open countryside, containing towns such as Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwick and Royal Leamington Spa. Nearly a third of the area lies in the West Midlands Green Belt and 8% falls within the Cotswolds National Landscape. The area is a gateway to the West Midlands, with its strongest links to Coventry.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section describes South Warwickshire today. The area covers 488 square miles of mainly open countryside across the two districts, including towns such as Alcester, Kenilworth, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick. It has good motorway and rail links between London and Birmingham, and 8% of it lies within the Cotswolds National Landscape. Nearly a third sits in the West Midlands Green Belt, which is designed to prevent urban sprawl. The area's strongest ties are with Coventry, as part of the Coventry and Warwickshire sub-region.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full housing allocation schedule under Policy DS.7, covering dozens of settlements from Alcester to Whitnash with indicative minimum capacities and requirements on flood risk, landscape, heritage and access. It also lists custom and self-build sites, allocations carried forward from adopted local and neighbourhood plans, and a Traveller site at Harbury Lane providing permanent pitches, transit bays and a support hub once Leamington Football Club relocates. The justification explains proposals including the Stratford-upon-Avon Gateway, Studley regeneration, Chandos Street, Warwick's cafe quarter, St Mary's Lands and Myton Community Stadium.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces support for development on land the plan has not specifically allocated, using a settlement hierarchy. Development is supported in principle within the built-up boundaries of the four Main Urban Areas: Kenilworth, Royal Leamington Spa and Whitnash, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick. Small and medium schemes are supported in eight Main Service Centres, including Alcester, Southam and Wellesbourne, while only small-scale proposals are supported in a longer list of Local Service Centres such as Barford and Harbury.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets a settlement hierarchy for proposals on unallocated land. Development is supported in principle within the built-up boundaries of four Main Urban Areas: Kenilworth, Royal Leamington Spa and Whitnash, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick. Small and medium-scale schemes are supported in eight Main Service Centres, including Alcester, Bidford-on-Avon, Shipston-on-Stour and Southam. Small-scale development only is supported in a long list of Local Service Centres, from Alderminster to Tredington.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section gives the full Policy DS.8 and its justification. Beyond the urban areas and service centres, Rural Service Centres, villages within the Green Belt or Cotswolds National Landscape, are limited to infilling only, and in the wider countryside proposals are judged against Policies DS.9 to DS.12. The plan relies on a small amount of windfall development, meaning schemes on sites it has not identified, and this policy provides the flexibility to handle them. Developers are expected to engage with the local community before submitting applications.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets out where the Green Belt boundary will change to make room for the plan's proposals. Six villages, including Bubbenhall, Claverdon and Snitterfield, are taken out of the Green Belt. Land is also removed for new settlements and major growth sites at places such as Hatton, Kenilworth South, Leamington Spa North, South of Coventry and Coventry Airport, plus smaller sites at Alcester, Hampton Magna, Kenilworth, Studley and Stoneleigh. A boundary error at Leek Wootton is also corrected.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the Green Belt changes in full. It allows neighbourhood plans to release small Green Belt sites for local needs where strict conditions are met. National policy applies to proposals both in and out of the Green Belt, and the Golden Rules on affordable housing do not apply to land released under the older 2016 and 2017 local plans. A Green Belt Review found exceptional circumstances justify the changes, because many of the most sustainable growth locations sit within the Green Belt.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects land needed for future transport schemes from development that could block their delivery. Protected projects include reopening the Stratford to Honeybourne railway, a new station at Long Marston Airfield, and double-tracking the Coventry to Leamington line with a second platform at Kenilworth. It also safeguards land for a multi-modal transport interchange near the University of Warwick, park and ride sites serving Leamington and Stratford-upon-Avon, disused railway lines earmarked as future walking and cycling routes, and improvements to key A46, M40 and M42 junctions.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section lists the full set of protected transport schemes and explains the approach. Alongside rail, park and ride and strategic road junction schemes, it safeguards major link roads tied to specific development sites, including routes at Stratford-upon-Avon, Wellesbourne, Henley-in-Arden, Kenilworth, Warwick, Stoneleigh and Bidford, and a new consolidated M40 junction to replace Junctions 13 and 14. Development in these areas is only permitted where it would not hinder a scheme's design, delivery or operation, or is temporary or reversible. The aim is to prevent prejudicial development without needlessly sterilising land.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects a corridor of land for a proposed western bypass of Stratford-upon-Avon, running between the A3400 Shipston Road and the A46 Alcester Road. The bypass is needed to deliver the new community at Long Marston Airfield and development south of the town. The route would cross the B439 Evesham Road, join the B3462 Campden Road south of Clifford Chambers, and cross the Stratford greenway at a height that keeps open its possible future reinstatement as a railway. Development in the corridor must not hinder the scheme.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains why the Stratford-upon-Avon bypass corridor is protected. Traffic modelling shows there is not enough highway capacity for further significant development south of the town, with constraints including the historic Clopton Bridge. A bypass would add capacity and bring environmental and public realm benefits to the historic town centre. Because the scheme is at an early stage, the corridor is a broad area of search rather than a fixed route, protecting delivery without unnecessarily sterilising land.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy supports Park and Ride facilities in identified locations, provided proposals are backed by a strategic case, feasibility work and demand assessment. At Stratford-upon-Avon, it supports reconfiguring the existing Park and Ride to enable development consistent with Proposal STR.1, keeping its capacity at 700 car parking spaces. Park and Ride lets drivers leave their cars at the edge of town and travel in by bus.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full Park and Ride policy. Alongside the Stratford-upon-Avon sites, including a possible 500-space facility near the Rosebird Centre, it supports a public transport interchange south of Coventry serving the University of Warwick, a potential 500-space facility linked to the Coventry and Warwick Investment Zone, and sites north of Leamington, west of Warwick and south of Leamington. Development near these areas of search must not obstruct future delivery. Locations were identified with Warwickshire County Council and are at different stages of development.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires development to protect, improve and extend green and blue infrastructure, meaning natural assets such as open spaces, trees, rivers and canals. Schemes must secure management and funding for these features for at least 30 years. Proposals should contribute to strategic opportunities identified in the evidence, such as restoring ancient woodlands, a River Avon Linear Park and better access to the canals. Design must respond to local landscape character, connect habitats, use native and climate-resilient planting and help reduce flood risk.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the green and blue infrastructure policy and sets measurable standards. Major developments must provide a green and blue infrastructure strategy. Commercial schemes must achieve an Urban Greening Factor score of at least 0.3 and residential schemes at least 0.4. Tree canopy must cover at least 14% of commercial sites and 20% of residential sites, or improve on existing cover if that is greater. These networks support wildlife, manage flood risk, store carbon and provide accessible space for recreation.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section describes South Warwickshire's key economic assets beyond its major investment sites. They include the Silicon Spa gaming cluster around Leamington, employing over 2,000 highly skilled people, the automotive industry with Aston Martin, JLR and Lotus, food and drink businesses, and a highly skilled workforce. Tourism assets include Shakespeare's Birthplace, Warwick and Kenilworth castles and the Royal Shakespeare Company. Around 70% of Warwickshire is agricultural land, and the section stresses the need to safeguard existing employment uses.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy supports the growth and improvement of existing visitor attractions and encourages new ones across South Warwickshire, subject to other plan policies. All tourism and leisure development must be sensitive to the character of the area and designed to maximise benefits for local communities through job opportunities and support for local services. Wherever possible, tourist and visitor facilities should be located in existing or replacement buildings, particularly where they sit outside settlements.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out why the plan supports tourism. Stratford-upon-Avon is home to the world's most important Shakespeare heritage sites and the Royal Shakespeare Company. Other attractions include the castles at Warwick and Kenilworth, Stoneleigh Abbey, country houses such as Compton Verney and Charlecote, the canal network, and the regency buildings and parks of Royal Leamington Spa, along with Stratford Butterfly Farm and the British Motor Museum. The plan seeks growth that keeps these assets attractive, especially those linked to the historic environment.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects the predominantly residential areas within the town centres of Leamington Spa, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick, as defined on the Policies Map. Within these areas, a change of use from residential to non-residential will only be permitted where the proposed use maintains the residential character of the area. It sits alongside the wider town centre policies that encourage people to live in and around town centres.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the protection given to homes in town centres. Royal Leamington Spa and Warwick both have large numbers of houses and apartments within their town centre boundaries, which add diversity and vitality but create pressure where different uses sit side by side. Uses such as small offices, dental surgeries and children's nurseries may be acceptable in these residential areas, provided the residential character and appearance of the building and area are not altered. The council will also consider the cumulative effect of such changes.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the heritage assets policy in full. It extends protection to heritage at risk, historic townscapes in places such as Kenilworth, Royal Leamington Spa, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick, historic landscapes, and assets contributing to the Cotswolds National Landscape. Applicants affecting a heritage asset or its setting must assess its significance using appropriate expertise. Substantial harm to or total loss of a designated asset will be refused unless substantial public benefits outweigh it, while lesser harm must be justified and weighed against public benefits.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full waterways policy. Development affecting waterways must not harm water quality, heritage, landscape, biodiversity or the usability of towpaths, and should improve access and active travel routes. On navigable waterways, moorings and marinas are supported where they do not damage the waterway or its surroundings, with canal regeneration encouraged, notably around the Grand Union Canal Conservation Area. Culverts are permitted for access only. Major schemes should consider new moorings for boat dwellers and strategic opportunities such as the Tach Brook re-naturalisation and a River Avon Linear Park.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the reasoning behind the parking policy. National policy says parking standards should reflect how accessible a site is, public transport options, car ownership and the need for electric vehicle charging. Detailed standards sit in separate Technical Guidance, and anyone departing from them must justify it with a parking survey. Lower car parking may be justified in Leamington, Warwick and Kenilworth town centres, with zones applying in Stratford-upon-Avon. Parking approved through planning does not guarantee on-street parking or resident permits.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out road safety requirements and the reasoning behind them. In urban areas, residential streets should be designed for 20mph, with continuous footpaths and cycleways connecting to the surrounding network. In rural areas, new accesses need good visibility and speed reduction where necessary, with the needs of horse riders and farm vehicles considered. Warwickshire County Council aims to cut deaths and serious injuries on its roads by 50% by 2030, working towards zero by 2050.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section covers the Long Marston Airfield New Community, a 697-hectare site for at least 10,300 homes, with a minimum of 4,500 built by 2050. It also provides 15 hectares of employment land, 21 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, four primary schools, a secondary school with land reserved for a second, a district centre, three local centres and a new country park. Early phases of 500 homes can start first, but wider development depends on the Stratford-upon-Avon Bypass opening, expected in 2035. Land is safeguarded for a railway station.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section covers proposal GAY.1, a 588-hectare employment allocation at Gaydon next to the Jaguar Land Rover and Aston Martin Lagonda sites. It provides about 157 hectares of strategic employment land and 81 hectares of non-strategic land, focused on automotive manufacturing. At least 50% of floorspace on the main site must be industrial or research uses, with warehousing capped at 50%. It includes 51 hectares for JLR expansion, 7.5 hectares for AML, 73.5 hectares of testing tracks, and a travelling showpersons yard of at least 8 plots.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section describes proposal HEN.1 at Henley-in-Arden, a 125-hectare masterplanned development of at least 2,084 homes, largely on the golf club land, delivered from 2029/30 to 2044/45. It includes 3.3 hectares of employment land, a two-form entry primary school, expansion of the secondary school with a new sixth form, 9 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, and a new country park at Beaudesert Mount. A link road from the A3400 to the A4189, including a new rail bridge, will let through traffic bypass the town centre. The site will be released from the Green Belt.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section describes proposal STR.1, north of Stratford-upon-Avon. The Clopton Quarter will deliver at least 777 homes, land for a new education facility, 4 Gypsy and Traveller pitches, new community orchards and a new gateway to Welcombe Hills Country Park with a visitor centre. The allocation also redevelops the town's Park and Ride with about 139 higher-density homes at 90 per hectare and a two-storey decked car park keeping roughly 390 spaces per floor. Delivery runs from 2029/30 to 2037/38, with main access from a new A46 roundabout.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out proposal STR.2, a 174-hectare site south-east of Stratford-upon-Avon delivering at least 2,727 homes between 2030/31 and 2048/49. It includes two new primary schools, a six-form entry secondary school, an on-site health facility, a mobility hub and 15 Gypsy and Traveller pitches. A new spine road will connect Shipston Road and Banbury Road. Design must avoid merging Stratford with Clifford Chambers or Tiddington, and a large area of parkland to the east will focus on biodiversity net gain.