Design & placemaking

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains how the criteria for new traveller sites will be applied. Because few sites will meet every criterion, a best-fit approach will be used. Private sites should have no more than 15 pitches, though larger public sites may be acceptable where good management is shown. The councils will explore a negotiated stopping approach to unauthorised encampments, likely alongside other Warwickshire authorities, and an 8-bay transit site with a Traveller support hub is planned at Harbury Lane. It also notes that Travelling Showpeople traditionally live and store their equipment on the same yard.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets design standards for new Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople sites. Sites must have proper water, power, sewerage, drainage and waste services, good landscaping with natural boundary treatments rather than imposing metal fencing, efficient use of land without overcrowding, and layouts that support health, privacy and children's play. Each pitch must measure at least 500 square metres and include hard standing for a touring and a static caravan, two parking spaces, an amenity building, storage space and a garden area.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the reasoning behind the design standards for traveller sites. Applications must include a layout plan showing the site can accommodate the pitches or plots proposed. Shared family sites may have a communal amenity building to help combat loneliness, while multi-family sites need individual buildings. Travelling Showpeople yards must keep living areas separate from equipment storage and maintenance areas. High design standards are considered essential given the number of pitches needed, so that new homes are safe, well integrated and support residents' health and wellbeing.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets rules for permanent residential moorings for people living on boats. In built-up areas, moorings must not harm navigation or safety, must maintain the character and biodiversity of the waterway, and need good walking, cycling and public transport access, safe vehicle access, well-designed parking and proper utilities including water, electricity, sewage disposal and laundry facilities. In open countryside, permanent moorings are only allowed within recreational mooring basins, where at least 50% of existing leisure moorings must be kept and external lighting limited to what safety requires.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the boat dweller policy. The Housing and Planning Act 2016 requires councils to consider the needs of people living on inland waterways. An assessment identified a need for 35 permanent residential moorings across the two districts to 2050, but a local marina has since secured a certificate confirming no limit on its permanent moorings, providing enough supply to meet that need. The policy therefore acts as a framework for judging any future proposals as boat dwelling continues to evolve.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the detailed rules for self-build schemes. Plots should come in clusters of around 5 to 9, with Design Codes and Plot Passports setting the design rules for multi-plot sites. Plots must first be offered to people with a local connection through living, working or close family in South Warwickshire, with an exemption for current and recent armed forces members. Plots must be fully serviced and marketed at a fair, independently valued price for at least 12 months; unsold plots may then become open market homes. Guidance also covers phasing and Community Infrastructure Levy exemptions.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy sets climate resilient design expectations for new-build major development, meaning 10 or more homes or 1,000 square metres of floorspace. Applicants must show they have tackled overheating risk using the cooling hierarchy, which works through steps in order. The first steps are cutting internal heat from equipment, then limiting summer heat entering the building through orientation, shading, light-coloured materials, windows and insulation. Later steps manage heat inside through thermal mass, high ceilings and passive ventilation.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains Policy NZ.5 on designing buildings to cope with a hotter climate. Major new developments must follow the cooling hierarchy, using passive measures first and active cooling such as air conditioning only as a last resort. Detailed overheating assessments using the industry methods CIBSE TM52 (non-residential) and TM59 (residential) are encouraged, ideally tested against projected 2050 or 2080 weather. The councils argue that the basic route through national Building Regulations Part O is not enough, partly because it does not cover workplaces, schools or leisure buildings.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full requirements of Policy NZ.7 on local energy systems for major development. Applicants must submit a feasibility and viability assessment covering heat networks, on-site renewables, heat pumps, storage and embodied carbon. They must also carry out thermal masterplanning, which maps heat demand and safeguards routes for future energy infrastructure. A clear order of preference applies for heating, starting with connection to a heat network and ending with other systems only where better options are unworkable. Schemes must also plan for grid capacity, energy resilience and long-term management.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the policy on local energy systems for minor development. As well as encouraging measures such as solar panels, heat pumps and battery storage, it supports sharing energy infrastructure across neighbouring sites where this causes no unacceptable harm to amenity, landscape or the environment. Energy equipment must be sensitively designed to limit impacts on landscape, heritage, noise, air quality, biodiversity, flood risk and neighbours. The justification notes that decentralised energy helps achieve net zero, eases pressure on the electricity grid and avoids locking in high carbon systems.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full protection rules for wildlife sites, habitats and species. Development causing loss or deterioration of internationally designated sites, Sites of Special Scientific Interest or irreplaceable habitats such as ancient woodland will be refused, and locally important sites are also protected. Minimum wildlife buffers apply: 50 metres from ancient woodland and veteran trees, 30 metres from other woodland, 8 metres either side of watercourses and 5 metres either side of intact hedgerows. Up-to-date ecological surveys are required where protected assets may be affected.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the background to the Local Nature Recovery Strategy policy. The strategy was introduced by the Environment Act 2021 and prepared by Warwickshire County Council to identify the best places for creating and restoring habitats. It is not a planning designation and adds no new constraints, but councils must have regard to it. Developers can show compliance through green infrastructure design, aligning Biodiversity Net Gain with strategy priorities, and using its mapping data. Local habitats and species such as calcareous grassland, Eurasian curlews and lesser horseshoe bats get special consideration.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the full requirements for trees, hedges and woodlands. Development must keep buffer zones around ancient woodland and veteran trees, design retained trees into streets, open spaces and drainage from the start, and deliver a measurable increase in tree canopy cover. All planting must use native, climate-resilient species and have maintenance plans, including replacing failed planting. The justification notes tree cover is uneven across the area and points to recognised standards such as BS 5837 for tree protection and the UK Forestry Standard.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy states that South Warwickshire's historic environment should be conserved and, where appropriate, enhanced for its own value, for residents and visitors, and for its contribution to sense of place and the local economy. Development affecting heritage assets must be high quality and sensitively designed. The policy covers designated assets such as listed buildings, conservation areas, registered parks and gardens, battlefields and scheduled monuments, plus locally listed assets, designed landscapes, archaeological remains, and historic transport networks including canals and railways.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out the heritage assets policy in full. It extends protection to heritage at risk, historic townscapes in places such as Kenilworth, Royal Leamington Spa, Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick, historic landscapes, and assets contributing to the Cotswolds National Landscape. Applicants affecting a heritage asset or its setting must assess its significance using appropriate expertise. Substantial harm to or total loss of a designated asset will be refused unless substantial public benefits outweigh it, while lesser harm must be justified and weighed against public benefits.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section covers the preservation of heritage assets and the reasoning behind the heritage policy. The councils will use statutory powers, including repair and urgent works notices, to protect buildings on national and local heritage at risk registers. The justification highlights the economic value of assets such as Warwick Castle and Shakespeare's family homes, and explains that new development affecting historic buildings must use appropriate materials, with uPVC windows, artificial roof slates and plastic rainwater goods given as common examples of unsuitable choices.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains how conservation areas, locally listed assets and archaeology will be managed. Councils may use Article 4 Directions, which remove certain automatic development rights, to protect high quality townscapes and locally listed buildings. Warwick District Council keeps a list of locally important parks and gardens, such as Abbey Fields in Kenilworth and St Nicholas Park in Warwick, which will be considered in planning decisions. Applicants on strategic sites should check the Warwickshire Historic Environment Record, and field evaluation may be required where archaeological information is lacking.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy protects Registered Parks and Gardens and Registered Village Greens, which are formally recognised historic landscapes. Development affecting them is only supported where it conserves and enhances their historic significance, landscape character, biodiversity value and public amenity. Proposals must be landscape-led, preserve historic design and planting, deliver measurable Biodiversity Net Gain, safeguard openness and tranquillity, restore lost features where appropriate, and maintain public access. A proportionate Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy is required, plus a Heritage Impact Assessment where a designated heritage asset is affected.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy manages changes to existing buildings. Converting existing buildings is encouraged as an often more sustainable approach, but the existing housing stock is safeguarded: proposals must not cause a net loss of homes through demolition, conversion or change of use without overriding justification. Extensions and alterations must be of appropriate scale and subservient to the existing building, respecting local character, the cumulative effect of previous extensions, and neighbours' amenity. Outbuildings and annexes must likewise be subservient to the main building and carefully sited.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the policy on altering existing buildings. Replacement dwellings are only appropriate where the existing home is unsuitable for retention, and must be well sited, well designed and not significantly larger than the home replaced. The existing dwelling must have lawful use as a home and not have been demolished or abandoned before the application is decided. The justification notes that managing housing stock reduces the loss of homes, and that conversions can add to housing supply as windfall sites, though intensification can affect neighbours and local infrastructure.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy controls advertisements so they do not compromise amenity or highway safety. Adverts will be refused where their size, design, colour, materials or illumination would unduly harm a building's character or setting, with externally lit signs preferred, especially in conservation areas. Signage should be kept to a minimum, and digital displays and internally illuminated signs are discouraged in conservation areas and near listed buildings. Unacceptable safety impacts include blocking safety cameras, reducing natural surveillance or distracting road users.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out how advertisements will be controlled so they do not harm local character or highway safety. Adverts must not be excessive in size, design, colour, materials or illumination, and externally illuminated signs are preferred, especially in Conservation Areas. Digital displays and internally lit signs are discouraged near listed buildings and in Conservation Areas. Adverts should sit within the premises they relate to and must not obscure views, safety cameras or road signs, or distract drivers.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This policy requires new developments to provide convenient and adequate on-site parking, including visitor, disabled and parent-and-child spaces, plus motorcycle and cycle parking. Parking levels should encourage public transport and active travel, with a more flexible approach in town centres. Less off-street parking is acceptable within 1km of a railway station in the main urban areas, or within 500m in other settlements. Published parking standards and design guidance will apply, and multistorey car parks are supported where they suit the area's character.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section explains the reasoning behind the parking policy. National policy says parking standards should reflect how accessible a site is, public transport options, car ownership and the need for electric vehicle charging. Detailed standards sit in separate Technical Guidance, and anyone departing from them must justify it with a parking survey. Lower car parking may be justified in Leamington, Warwick and Kenilworth town centres, with zones applying in Stratford-upon-Avon. Parking approved through planning does not guarantee on-street parking or resident permits.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out road safety requirements and the reasoning behind them. In urban areas, residential streets should be designed for 20mph, with continuous footpaths and cycleways connecting to the surrounding network. In rural areas, new accesses need good visibility and speed reduction where necessary, with the needs of horse riders and farm vehicles considered. Warwickshire County Council aims to cut deaths and serious injuries on its roads by 50% by 2030, working towards zero by 2050.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section introduces the site proposals chapter, which sets out concept masterplans and requirements for the plan's strategic allocations and key sites. These proposals should be read alongside Policy DS.4. The masterplans are the starting point for more detailed masterplanning work, which must be agreed before any planning application. Because the sites will take many years to build, some flexibility on detail is accepted at the early stages.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out proposal BID.1, a mixed-use urban extension north and east of Bidford-on-Avon delivering at least 2,225 homes between 2033 and 2050 across around 221 hectares. It includes two primary schools, land for a secondary school, an early years facility, a local centre, 11 hectares of employment land and 8 Gypsy and Traveller pitches. A new link road with a bridge over the River Avon will cut traffic through the village centre, and open space will keep a green gap between Bidford and neighbouring Broom.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section sets out proposal COV.3 at Kings Hill, south of Coventry. The 269-hectare site will deliver at least 4,000 homes in line with the adopted Kings Hill Masterplan and Design Code, of which 2,500 already have outline permission. It includes two two-form entry primary schools, a six-form entry secondary school with room to expand to eight forms, and two neighbourhood centres with a community centre and GP surgery. A multimodal spine road, bus gate access and provision for very light rail serve the site, with densities from 35 to 50 homes per hectare.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section covers the Stoneleigh Employment Group, proposals STO.1 to STO.3, across 188 hectares. Together they deliver about 82.3 hectares of non-strategic employment land: 5.4 hectares through intensifying Stoneleigh Park, 64.9 hectares north and south of Stoneleigh Road, and 12 hectares at Manor Fields Farm. A new multimodal spine road, using former HS2 compound land, will give an alternative access to Stoneleigh Park and act as a bypass for Stoneleigh village. Development must protect Kings Wood, the Stoneleigh Abbey estate and other heritage assets, with delivery from 2030 onwards.

The human version (we wrote this, not the council)This section presents the Stratford-upon-Avon Gateway Masterplan in drawing form. It consists of two figures: one showing land use and urban form principles for the Gateway site, and another showing the height and massing principles that new buildings there should follow. The detail sits in the plan drawings themselves rather than in written policy text.